Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp8000487pxb; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:05:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDNQQoyA9tAyT07dTsa7ieHQwFeyq4tXb18etOb3jETt4JkQy2r2GQE3nrbreijGPlj0C7 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1152:: with SMTP id g18mr9250765edw.18.1613739938403; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:05:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613739938; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rhqiz0fbXlt4AQCJq1cgGmehSD4kbXPTqkzac0exe9+3CC3MhLRsutRhMyZZipDpVk 95hhv0bvkziuQCTV2cnj/iuUTeuYydLMlvDijoRByi7T00DG+PcvnxYPPxgw5leeh1bj ac9Vtpkxl1/y8BSiIKhm0+loFyMNWJZWZ+7K+6ZnabX5aJ50XXPlMPPIxF5JkjjR+8zi KnCoP1F/20eftoxoFRAyBOAky3wBKJ+LDgX0MCDvjV9j29YZF3BlLLUsy9YjJRb8ZIjh OQaB/ENk71VrMBCmfELOI1Xw9BpN4rxdMhJVrWG4PUGTzH4Z4jAqNADE8cnGpin625qG NgdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=G7DwxRJVCAKrLzAyMJM0Pj0xAxiVePJ77qA8gc+t8a4=; b=ojdQaURvI2QQdHFqXQqFx7APQfg4miyjKW3xdTKUPRJ6JokhEhOmeQJsSX4CRptVPb Ex4jzB29ClSXRd1Cdu7o8lPznSp19oAMkES+FHCT6tn2ORxg+J31QgokZjJtl+etNyXx ++HJds5yVTJCDrwUH+ePHyfPYe+8Ob3j+bqZlRQujzU+QIdrm3wF5jv+tl+tzxuzKMVx YXik7n2B2opY+iJK1eyzeIQSWN6udgi+PlEXF5aYVANDFOjiL1zqJL4dt6Fv+mtfiANo CkwqMYz/jnDqjdxDs7Gj3sE+297MbXKgNZODi422hqcPrSlurGszvD59pSImuHEo4srC k9UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hb10si5839986ejb.414.2021.02.19.05.05.12; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230160AbhBSNDW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:03:22 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35836 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229998AbhBSNDR (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:03:17 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF70106F; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:02:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8A4253F73B; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:02:30 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Lingutla Chandrasekhar , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Quentin Perret , Pavan Kondeti , Rik van Riel Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Ignore percpu threads for imbalance pulls Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:59:57 +0000 Message-Id: <20210219130003.2890-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210219130003.2890-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20210219130003.2890-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lingutla Chandrasekhar In load balancing, when balancing group is unable to pull task due to ->cpus_ptr constraints from busy group, then it sets LBF_SOME_PINNED to lb env flags, as a consequence, sgc->imbalance is set for its parent domain level. which makes the group classified as imbalance to get help from another balancing cpu. Consider a 4-CPU big.LITTLE system with CPUs 0-1 as LITTLEs and CPUs 2-3 as Bigs with below scenario: - CPU0 doing newly_idle balancing - CPU1 running percpu kworker and RT task (small tasks) - CPU2 running 2 big tasks - CPU3 running 1 medium task While CPU0 is doing newly_idle load balance at MC level, it fails to pull percpu kworker from CPU1 and sets LBF_SOME_PINNED to lb env flag and set sgc->imbalance at DIE level domain. As LBF_ALL_PINNED not cleared, it tries to redo the balancing by clearing CPU1 in env cpus, but it don't find other busiest_group, so CPU0 stops balacing at MC level without clearing 'sgc->imbalance' and restart the load balacing at DIE level. And CPU0 (balancing cpu) finds LITTLE's group as busiest_group with group type as imbalance, and Bigs that classified the level below imbalance type would be ignored to pick as busiest, and the balancing would be aborted without pulling any tasks (by the time, CPU1 might not have running tasks). It is suboptimal decision to classify the group as imbalance due to percpu threads. So don't use LBF_SOME_PINNED for per cpu threads. Signed-off-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar [Use kthread_is_per_cpu() rather than p->nr_cpus_allowed] Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 8a8bd7b13634..2d4dcf1a3372 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7539,6 +7539,10 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) if (throttled_lb_pair(task_group(p), env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu)) return 0; + /* Disregard pcpu kthreads; they are where they need to be. */ + if ((p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && kthread_is_per_cpu(p)) + return 0; + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) { int cpu; -- 2.27.0