Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp8086241pxb; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:07:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfQxeY4PLFSMM1/BI3NHa8NwpWvASBROnsMe6NStzWgnnN31IZXs1ejKwt2RXnXr1VqFFu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c0d:: with SMTP id ck13mr9803246edb.295.1613747250411; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:07:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613747250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V69Ufj/UuLNrnvUSlff+my/K7AUmSG5Sk9/FXHyGYMvwnIDmu24wyUhuspVNjq9NvX t05M63+WxevMBM1ZnlTKtTPOqHJJ9uhsatUHt/uPasrVQOvuoReq0atgnq76rvfHrfp0 TJ+ZrTSg9SvqpqGn7BEZJS/7aniGbXKtdt7xktQJDjJKZqMmCZXJbK6e2fVFu1kvEI/F Uux9qCi8IGNy6eW+ZRL+hMZHgPnyYWLUEl5Ghl1w5jmPUlhnafOkhhRtYqQPQxRLx2ok 4t2Tol4SObHEcelb4EeEKMmSQgXA2fSBCoxpg8B97aQL/RReNYm9HcEAfbb59wfETsl/ SfUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=XiaBGnefPGVZiyojOjiX+s6W4j/8HRWeaHwUaEvX3fc=; b=L6t+fOuYvXwQPEaIJqltaic3KZD3Aeud+SMW4E0O+phCxrzHMrY4Vm1AClbcDgpnPn mgJ3yQK0CcM99rKx0KAN3s0VUrEwsF8EzZBua3VhoO8PiOn6Bizr/SluKEEJlgmy9UFO zUqyDQkhmeyIWhqAhmrW9kS6qsybGuXNO1IAyO5ndB20QqD2XkXTOyN62lzC0MU9QRPs 2oQYlacZR/i3tXvkhdfH5hXqiKtVI+MRlUyS6AFxottkUYogSKT/a82QsvCf7FGq8Og9 IX+wxEYBFhqvIuKoVM29DM2w5dKJD5E2iCmXPsQheps/nlK/aeA7HLqdUk8/QEsiKBRP pp0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Bx1NkyZM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x13si3395357ejc.345.2021.02.19.07.07.06; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Bx1NkyZM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229594AbhBSPGa (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:06:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229524AbhBSPG3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:06:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF43DC061574 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id ba1so3526972plb.1 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:05:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XiaBGnefPGVZiyojOjiX+s6W4j/8HRWeaHwUaEvX3fc=; b=Bx1NkyZMHAyZDfmo5hgwsduVDXIrfyfb2POhnhkcVDHh9IY/YaLRluW1in1fg6Xnw8 ylll6X9unFr9/sy/SPV0JLpPge6MOoRWcWbrDrtv2fFjDvSYeueaP15cXjvOw0GnnNOP TqTfGWJOERAffqs0TTLlZza+YRdRPWaL3qzZrbFzKFGMvr7y+LBfptWMU1CbmvTD1lSL EXKjSrP63trB+VIAKo4RrYf1sDhppnkkLuiHN7m2m0F6/9O7/K2gHEp9cO8MvuT18+Qc cxE6+SIzdL+OXN992mJnSl7705567Oc2FUlfTH2uPsaC5tDQ8NqqAbphm+CRV6sQ4QgS v/CQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XiaBGnefPGVZiyojOjiX+s6W4j/8HRWeaHwUaEvX3fc=; b=SVGEAG+BYjzDbsxFrx5u+9rssYIMEu6/GEB9JZrQxwDhupj3bPl5qm36d+6wWaHmNN cNM9mDLMOrUnI6BCIOUO/BzGKwTBRGvtsV0wSUr7KLzLYy6zampNriAypdnmp8FRSvDX wdCMWEwzjI6beE5z9oNJ8pXSsE/VjvEJZ/0g+Dh5sphvdfRh1V0RAdRCI5pIQgze2N7Z 8FYdJz2/pENVoWdeg6Yi5lnyCLbPUtREytpAOrVzTWeA6G3Mas7dzeosE5LsSVtfG4RI 5MALECoYjgjMele4XdBfyu8xZcQ1OcfX5jmrfSLuOvvJRNTSrA/q5NUUcVVxqR6d+KXl gozA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533o916GEG0tnWKyOJJ4l0bIJ/70AAeSGeyBnGjSQtybWg4FtDYy HrZhIessjrB7pV1/3ueoxUo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa4b:b029:e2:bb4b:a63 with SMTP id c11-20020a170902aa4bb02900e2bb4b0a63mr9430913plr.7.1613747145225; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.230.29.30] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 194sm9625165pfu.165.2021.02.19.07.05.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:05:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years? To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Scott Branden Cc: Willy Tarreau , Florian Fainelli , Sasha Levin , BCM Kernel Feedback , LKML , Linux ARM References: <8cf503db-ac4c-a546-13c0-aac6da5c073b@broadcom.com> <20210218165104.GC2013@sasha-vm> <00b9e2fb-d818-58d6-edae-4dbd6aa814f7@gmail.com> <20210218182050.GB15217@1wt.eu> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:05:41 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/19/2021 12:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:16:50PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote: >> On 2021-02-18 10:36 a.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:20:50PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:53:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 09:21:13AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>>>> As a company, we are most likely shooting ourselves in the foot by not >>>>>> having a point of coordination with the Linux Foundation and key people >>>>>> like you, Greg and other participants in the stable kernel. >>>>> >>>>> What does the LF have to do with this? >>>>> >>>>> We are here, on the mailing lists, working with everyone. Just test the >>>>> -rc releases we make and let us know if they work or not for you, it's >>>>> not a lot of "coordination" needed at all. >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise, if no one is saying that they are going to need these for 6 >>>>> years and are willing to use it in their project (i.e. and test it), >>>>> there's no need for us to maintain it for that long, right? >>>> >>>> Greg, please remember I expressed I really need them for slightly more than >>>> 3 years (say 3.5-4) :-) I'm fine with helping a bit more as time permits if >>>> this saves me from having to take over these kernels after you, like in the >>>> past, but I cannot engage on the regularity of my availability. >>> >>> Ok, great! >>> >>> That's one person/company saying they can help out (along with what CIP >>> has been stating.) >>> >>> What about others? Broadcom started this conversation, odd that they >>> don't seem to want to help out :) >> Greg, I'm sorry but I'm not in a position to provide such a commitment. > > Ok, who at Broadcom do I need to talk to to get that type of commitment? I am not sure if I was too subtle before, we (Broadcom) cannot give you an unified voice to speak with because we are divided in silos/business units that make their independent decisions. The group I work in (STB/CM, different from Scott's) is committed to using the 5.10 kernel for 6 years and that is a decision that has been taken. I could give you names of other decision makers in other business units I know who also deliver Linux for their respective business units however some of them may not make public appearances on mailing lists, let alone care about upstreaming their changes so I do not know whether a 6 years 5.10 kernel is even something they remotely entertain. Hope this helps. -- Florian