Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:40:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:40:45 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:58629 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:39:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:39:25 -0600 To: vda Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.5 is available Message-ID: <20011106113925.D768@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <20208.1005048011@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <01110614460902.00798@nemo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01110614460902.00798@nemo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [vda] > I don't use kbuild yet but really like the idea. > What prevents its adoption as a standard kernel build tool? Integration into the kernel tree, which is scheduled for very early in the 2.5 cycle. (Before you ask, NO, we do not need yet another brand new thing in 2.4!) Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/