Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:13:23 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@caramail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@corellium.com>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/25] tty: serial: samsung_tty: Use
 devm_ioremap_resource
Message-ID: <20210220191323.ugmzrtkvcxyqqolj@kozik-lap>
References: <20210215121713.57687-1-marcan@marcan.st>
 <20210215121713.57687-21-marcan@marcan.st>
 <20210215185135.onivzktfscv5myh2@kozik-lap>
 <20274436-7275-9734-5a07-d6da46b45c5f@marcan.st>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20274436-7275-9734-5a07-d6da46b45c5f@marcan.st>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:01:21PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 03.51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Also fix a bug checking the return value, which should use IS_ERR().
> > 
> > No, no, no. We never, never combine fixing bugs with some rework.
> > However devm_ioremap() returns NULL so where is the error?
> 
> Sorry, this was a commit message mistake. The code is correct and so is the
> patch: just the NULL check is correct for the previous variant and IS_ERR is
> correct for devm_ioremap_resource. I confused myself while writing the
> commit message after the fact.
> 
> > Did you test your patches on existing platforms? If not, please mark all
> > of them as RFT on next submission, so Greg does not pick them too fast.
> 
> I unfortunately don't have any Exynos devices where I could test the code (I
> have a couple but no serial connections, and I have no idea if mailine would
> run on them). I'll mark v3 as RFT.

If you have one of Odroid boards with Exynos, then you can nicely test
Exynos. Others - depends, on board.
Anyway I can test them for you. I just want to be sure that Greg waits
for this testing.

Best regards,
Krzysztof