Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:55:35 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <lars@metafoo.de>, <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
        <nuno.sa@analog.com>, <dragos.bogdan@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: core,buffer-dma: 2 fixes for the recent IIO
 buffer series
Message-ID: <20210221115535.5f380d99@archlinux>
In-Reply-To: <20210219085826.46622-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
References: <20210219085826.46622-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:58:24 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:

> Patchset contains 2 fixes for some patches that are present in the
> iio/testing branch.
> 
> No idea what's best now, either to re-send the series or to just send these
> fixes on their own.
> For now I chose to send the fixes on their (due to lack of time).
> 
> These could be squashed into the original.
>
That is the approach I've taken.

Tidier to do it this way as I'd not yet pushed the tree out other than as
testing.

Thanks,

Jonathan
 
> I can also re-send the series, but not from an Analog email; since I will
> not have access to it.
> 
> Alexandru Ardelean (2):
>   iio: core: use kfree_const in iio_free_chan_devattr_list() to free
>     names
>   iio: buffer-dma: fix type of 'i' in iio_dma_buffer_alloc_blocks()
> 
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c              | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>