Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1148293pxb; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:37:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAYHrdI3MO0589qIIqppi9ZSpyjA9iygVyfUtGgfzshUvJueNNmAxmVoxOylX63LOelKFZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:17c3:: with SMTP id u3mr17699514eje.304.1613943473531; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:37:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613943473; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bUymOs3pTYv5HBJwBqr7mKNZnWqJH95KU/CDAsYfNQzGmZqeI+5xKKmOBBHfgTJazk vK/1BVRptNZWCj6iRs0D2m+4MHml61J2iZt5769h9rSmrD1iaFdaAdVQnqXHIiDBEXAy 9kThG/tdsXhBbEINRWF12JGjMhktucICbJeS1z9r2TEzkWnzwhTKJ7fAzs+eR2W0x6BP cAS3gfeuuA9Q8h1FOnn2sozKTwcOOC62IBPq6KlZWD9kone4Fi58gS+XCaiEpLX745je cW0W4AApEpscPBosdt+RU/sjLtiTzg2Dlxo2l0a5fXDa5CJqF6hz7P9EY4uepUKSVWee KDkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=XQAcmkf2RclT/qwuk3V2P7XKjouxe/y/1cAOr+j4X/0=; b=esV+JgQb1q9qdvSNhTVZe3zwfdc27UCal39ke98rx9LiMSrxo9TbTNCyRC3ARziq0s YQ6pia5QtXCVwO5+Mm/HX5+QjH8tVBaq1JZ/Y4y2D8lrnxqeLrXQfjfAnldLUI7+nT4a oyRenc3WCY0anhtUEzmDtdFKDx5LeBc4eXSZFFcgLNkrRTm8N38VYnEf8KPXf36i708Y vdBbX5SFZqkKuiJFVz214vn7sOoE3cY14yp0YE/gyg/S+e5Sc8h4a2GwwRuLdIi8/j2L QuBT9FGEgqvmEJ7e54Plgc9PJu67hEVzo2YFOrDsmSn1uLl8a+QMTaQUK+LPOnhVuOrD Ov+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=mIY8fVoD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k21si10200794edo.563.2021.02.21.13.37.31; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=mIY8fVoD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230389AbhBUVe3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:34:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39866 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230177AbhBUVeV (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:34:21 -0500 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc2:55:216:3eff:fef7:d647]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15911C061574; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (62-78-145-57.bb.dnainternet.fi [62.78.145.57]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55E0FE9; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 22:33:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1613943215; bh=YWTHIZoxgpR8Ou0HcqMarxiDNYz+5jx52AA0RzNdiVE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mIY8fVoDs14eAj6GmpKVOQflWCt6OkzKOdVLl20gCjT8yquXiIAeN61pgzs1dFliG gK9NbsB5ckWNe1BI9vqdJoca1kEyU6mCSZqu0mu2c0XHW+2tR8sL7qd0t12AZaFtPG QkzXMmJcPX0UNRJOcS1Kz0AVb4CJmdwLcYYU8o2w= Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 23:33:05 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Nikolay K." Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: omap4iss: code style - avoid macro argument precedence issues Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Nikolay, On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:21:36AM +0300, Nikolay K. wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Thank you for the review. > I think that if we drop the unneeded parentheses here, we need to drop > them everywhere in the file for consistency, even in places checkpatch.pl That's a good point. > doesn't warn about. It'll increase patch size without actual usefullness > gain, as for me. I am very (very) novice to the kernel, > but who wants slightly more readable one-line simple macros? Let's keep your patch as-is, we can drop the unneeded parentheses in a subsequent patch if desired. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart