Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964838AbWIZVjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:39:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964842AbWIZVjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:39:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:11916 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964838AbWIZVjR (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:39:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:39:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andi Kleen cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19 In-Reply-To: <200609262323.10190.ak@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <200609261244.43863.ak@suse.de> <200609262226.09418.ak@suse.de> <200609262323.10190.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 807 Lines: 20 On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I normally do the main bulk the two week merge window and only important > stuff afterwards (usually two or three smaller merges with more stuff > and then only critical bug fixes in small batches until release). > > You want merges more often or more spaced out? That sounds fine, let's just see how this firms up. It's not like I've really had a lot of "rules" in general, and mostly the merges tend to eventually find a pattern that is just convenient for everybody. Linus "don't worry, be happy" Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/