Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1449599pxb; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:06:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPt79c95hMIc1FxQxiL23cDdqyE+GogyzRLe0a8027cjQmdozWDGOm8SYe7ugmSqc/q98u X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7f14:: with SMTP id d20mr20089661ejr.322.1613988414561; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:06:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613988414; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pXVY3R0qv2SyR6CuOjJEVfG1H6CppwyCjzkhCAUdUf7uNPE7BCwS2WP0Y1DEXYcg3U e7BPy8ZMG9diKNhB43ZHDpAXLaU9aHmd3jVqokZ+Wi4Zryj6Kj4as5RBff2nn12FQARr kQ56ceJHwit2CxSP3onHiSejtiWAAZnAaK1n2XQ95d5HFCl4mQjU4KedzEvkI+bconzu aGb3SaLfjEw/YFW/ajgb3HeX0KrJLFdrAi4XCXiOg/OmdpFNumK321+lmmsBCPVULbMy k9mtRvCUXTfxQmsoAmT+DoEkLO5idYqutrBU/5zPCp0qnpy4lJiq/8347hw2uLkn7W+Z eb+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=7HGiarusNUZR//vo/cVvWm30wLm1hPL/Bk26yUNojOc=; b=MZ0DG/oaA1LfOciK+zvEsTqsTq7MuZhwkBNfC5BkpNXxDqo5bGJjT/0cSDknZs4m+y yPP4Jkt/qw2clo41Eb42xJyxqMj4gFjf2VVT973Ljy/UbkGBOWxTBXEThjWJg6bqXM8d xEYpH1Yju2xNigEk2vxelHaIG9/AplcYVwKhDpdmtKgMymftIpyAT/vCrwJnbuu4oLni +2z0FjFfRgVNPo17QxAnLboOvavKg4RBzdjdbxnqlMyVl+w8LYSViQmDRnjLOkwhVmZT nrlVq/+dHD3IYXuwSzxoOUQSyXSEDRniPWN4gLu7qy64PUs7sU8RMuZ2ZOtU97nxlx2w +zoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l21si11813686edw.606.2021.02.22.02.06.31; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230431AbhBVKE0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 05:04:26 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38392 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230390AbhBVKAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 05:00:18 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65E4ED1; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.51.127]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2C873F73B; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:59:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:59:13 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, marcan@marcan.st, maz@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] arm64: irq: add a default handle_irq panic function Message-ID: <20210222095913.GA70951@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <20210219113904.41736-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20210219113904.41736-6-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210219113904.41736-6-mark.rutland@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:39:01AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > If we accidentally unmask IRQs before we've registered an IRQ > controller, handle_arch_irq will be NULL, and the IRQ exception handler > will branch to a bogus address. > > To make this easier to debug, this patch initialises handle_arch_irq to > a default handler which will panic(), making such problems easier to > debug. When we add support for FIQ handlers, we can follow the same > approach. > -void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *) __ro_after_init; > +void default_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + panic("IRQ taken without a registered IRQ controller\n"); > +} The kbuild test robot pointed out that this should be static (likewise with default_handle_fiq in patch 8), since it's only used within this file, so I've updated that in my branch. Mark. > + > +void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *) __ro_after_init = default_handle_irq; > > int __init set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)) > { > - if (handle_arch_irq) > + if (handle_arch_irq != default_handle_irq) > return -EBUSY; > > handle_arch_irq = handle_irq; > @@ -87,7 +92,7 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void) > init_irq_stacks(); > init_irq_scs(); > irqchip_init(); > - if (!handle_arch_irq) > + if (handle_arch_irq == default_handle_irq) > panic("No interrupt controller found."); > > if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { > -- > 2.11.0 >