Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:08:43 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de
Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To:     linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: objtool/core] objtool: Fix stack-swizzle for FRAME_POINTER=y
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <YC6UC+rc9KKmQrkd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <YC6UC+rc9KKmQrkd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <161399212333.20312.15799180882369631665.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Robot-ID: <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact <mailto:tglx@linutronix.de> to get blacklisted from these emails
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     23e34c5988088b8bb4c55905973ca76114cb33ee
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/23e34c5988088b8bb4c55905973ca76114cb33ee
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:14:10 +01:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:05:18 +01:00

objtool: Fix stack-swizzle for FRAME_POINTER=y

When objtool encounters the stack-swizzle:

	mov %rsp, (%[tos])
	mov %[tos], %rsp
	...
	pop %rsp

Inside a FRAME_POINTER=y build, things go a little screwy because
clearly we're not adjusting the cfa->base. This then results in the
pop %rsp not being detected as a restore of cfa->base so it will turn
into a regular POP and offset the stack, resulting in:

  kernel/softirq.o: warning: objtool: do_softirq()+0xdb: return with modified stack frame

Therefore, have "mov %[tos], %rsp" act like a PUSH (it sorta is
anyway) to balance the things out. We're not too concerned with the
actual stack_size for frame-pointer builds, since we don't generate
ORC data for them anyway.

Fixes: aafeb14e9da2 ("objtool: Support stack-swizzle")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YC6UC+rc9KKmQrkd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
 tools/objtool/check.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 62cd211..d7f1496 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1983,6 +1983,20 @@ static int update_cfi_state(struct instruction *insn, struct cfi_state *cfi,
 				}
 			}
 
+			else if (op->dest.reg == CFI_SP &&
+				 cfi->vals[op->src.reg].base == CFI_SP_INDIRECT &&
+				 cfi->vals[op->src.reg].offset == cfa->offset) {
+
+				/*
+				 * The same stack swizzle case 2) as above. But
+				 * because we can't change cfa->base, case 3)
+				 * will become a regular POP. Pretend we're a
+				 * PUSH so things don't go unbalanced.
+				 */
+				cfi->stack_size += 8;
+			}
+
+
 			break;
 
 		case OP_SRC_ADD: