Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1510140pxb; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:01:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwilW2uX0RXAfjielQhOTyQ+FiKCdHxFBXvZ6LgK8RK2K6y9cdzMJTmZk5AztFMf7ioYUF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7206:: with SMTP id m6mr13042342ejk.387.1613995303974; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:01:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613995303; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JIaRQe6lodrFlg5GblNRsBhQpdKcZ+P/1H08W06aE9O9CYvB8ONvDWJVPTEStHZFqg KT6Dzt8GzqgzYd22HJUO30lPCwAEVIWwE3Ez9TghO9oGK60/qkjgf77AmkK4RMiPaRU/ usrNs+1+14jvZoNrQ+v/aytMV5JwXQ1V2hMRlloKzPcPS6LW/dgUIjYMvFws7w9ws8JU VIy65Jm8xvpB4C5mbz2IEMG1Z5y9y2y1cV+/k6uIGu8GHOef/LeVpGp7B6vHHJP/zE// rqTmxYAIfyiS11frv0yfgZWHgCJpdTYQMtFuPsiIDrYEasW8A5R3ZS0fPrO4gFE9WSbb c+6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=7niZdZv9Q/ozoIxZitXAI/cSVEQMpQnnlVdn7ADbrsY=; b=Lxw4P93+NEs2+t3IUwe4/BShJ3GHZjdKQeIyXHWUql4j9knwE1XRNB5rL082HyMizp eQqnMetA/SXnuN1NXurw6dXsxvIKiH9+s5vml8osjweMyQ75qSpOZK/kFcMHUcSUcQWC 9VlLnHXWmki9vjBjiDV7dHcnnCcDUZLWnkr7Vf5OcUYLdZHpVVVoe2ffxlfMZ5++VAwq xFdQ1u8MgoQS6e2Ii/DLYKbgGtwCmAqO2A9l47z4dRxCPvIepsPNYbdTrxc2EH85qQap mrChRZvUvM/YO4Ze3WilPaba902dnkIx9ciI4c0kX42lpoEDes54FSjbQOBjvwuztAMv dZjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h19si11557677eji.32.2021.02.22.04.01.20; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230029AbhBVL6K (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:58:10 -0500 Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org ([194.107.17.57]:55208 "EHLO vmicros1.altlinux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229863AbhBVL6J (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:58:09 -0500 Received: from mua.local.altlinux.org (mua.local.altlinux.org [192.168.1.14]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B5672C8B3; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:57:26 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mua.local.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 508) id 29E067CC89C; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:57:26 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:57:26 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: Piotr Figiel Cc: Andrew Morton , mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, Alexey Dobriyan , Andrei Vagin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, posk@google.com, kyurtsever@google.com, ckennelly@google.com, pjt@google.com, emmir@google.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_RSEQ_CONFIGURATION request Message-ID: <20210222115726.GA30843@altlinux.org> References: <20210222100443.4155938-1-figiel@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210222100443.4155938-1-figiel@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:04:43AM +0100, Piotr Figiel wrote: [...] > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptrace.h > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ struct ptrace_syscall_info { > }; > }; > > +#define PTRACE_GET_RSEQ_CONFIGURATION 0x420f > + > +struct ptrace_rseq_configuration { > + __u64 rseq_abi_pointer; > + __u32 signature; > + __u32 pad; > +}; > + > /* > * These values are stored in task->ptrace_message > * by tracehook_report_syscall_* to describe the current syscall-stop. > diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c > index 61db50f7ca86..a936af66cf6f 100644 > --- a/kernel/ptrace.c > +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include /* for syscall_get_* */ > > @@ -779,6 +780,22 @@ static int ptrace_peek_siginfo(struct task_struct *child, > return ret; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ > +static long ptrace_get_rseq_configuration(struct task_struct *task, > + unsigned long size, void __user *data) > +{ > + struct ptrace_rseq_configuration conf = { > + .rseq_abi_pointer = (u64)(uintptr_t)task->rseq, > + .signature = task->rseq_sig, > + }; > + > + size = min_t(unsigned long, size, sizeof(conf)); > + if (copy_to_user(data, &conf, size)) > + return -EFAULT; > + return size; > +} > +#endif From API perspective I suggest for such interfaces to return the amount of data that could have been written if there was enough room specified, e.g. in this case it's sizeof(conf) instead of size. -- ldv