Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1586707pxb; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:04:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV032nUd6RF58JMr91UeNS7CGtACYmANNG/kBZp9WmgCFzbUi35idLDNWRGgWAa8BzPv0j X-Received: by 2002:adf:e809:: with SMTP id o9mr21722108wrm.137.1614002652975; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:04:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614002652; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CpMKXrIz7e02bJ4+GAqdQAFIkRMyapUHfMmLGP6K3SMdj7QHirwcyL/jjqIkHlPP+z KqBi6Xb+2HR6+YlJqGNr3xArK7xOizRTXZGioF+vXKuPZzzvNtLHXSSlYmfuCJPnEVFp eNndxyBBdQxWxsppRTyjGazKo8jWvBNluRex2nZqMmJTRu1MKJdW453Hw/1LneUWwuFZ IQx9I3MaNpbMJVppy00Q8GhZ0XFiOSAS/62jGq2TvkBGZ0nlyC1uFXV8Xv5cEQ6azvmK ya4YTEeOgsx3HnOr/OFEsMfz8GWiQ3QcinscI1+GsTh91rps//hCAeWPYSZuPlOAo31S 66yw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=TRfCGo+d4jZVJhCFZnvsjweX1KWQd9768AoENBDOGlQ=; b=PnMCKFnCySs1BIPlpSGhePF6143esy5rzJoshuG9Ri+KgHvXHAiu9hsM1mp3xKMqrM g6LWUwUiMbFjKS78HNX+yVCi0HgBsWIYqmgJmDxjfD/MJbwnMFpQxlEJBDiwpdiQPHbI 6wkvmKGatmKVfKYuds6X8FPjlgBWX4C+vnHQSVgdOqBzHYgBK4ATZ4F8ivNddgMcvjap G2juzb4raChAHCGrwlgAXQdP3gmB03W8abvJhkZ40q52ci5u6xjll4uFpd1aoUH3x8vH Pn0yTZdjwbhHkgctycgTjf0AmTx6/O7UUODI77T+CXhmdqCNPqwty75OcetTTB3t0GtH 0eLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Qn+Qu1xU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qt10si11727174ejb.336.2021.02.22.06.03.49; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Qn+Qu1xU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231344AbhBVOCk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:02:40 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28402 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231723AbhBVNBi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:01:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613998811; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TRfCGo+d4jZVJhCFZnvsjweX1KWQd9768AoENBDOGlQ=; b=Qn+Qu1xU8JodbOvqeKyZ3DayzZmbM8s0yxq7r4T6B4FSVeUYcE404TEGaVMNrcS5ODXh5W lgNUPAdYHAK4xvAf0m/uMdwDybP2rER/dZ8p4C34udc90CqLlfQzh2Kmd78wmzJ0WM4zGs I5wiAqJnoPJIik6z78H5epmTwU4J2t0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-368-1hH8o-AHMaSAy3fNzDzl1g-1; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:00:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1hH8o-AHMaSAy3fNzDzl1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7EF8799EC; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.115.16] (ovpn-115-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5648872F85; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/madvise: introduce MADV_POPULATE to prefault/prealloc memory To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Oscar Salvador , Matthew Wilcox , Andrea Arcangeli , Minchan Kim , Jann Horn , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave Hansen , Hugh Dickins , Rik van Riel , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Vlastimil Babka , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Thomas Bogendoerfer , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <20210217154844.12392-1-david@redhat.com> <640738b5-a47e-448b-586d-a1fb80131891@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <73f73cf2-1b4e-bfa9-9a4c-3192d7b7a5ec@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:59:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.02.21 13:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sat 20-02-21 10:12:26, David Hildenbrand wrote: > [...] >> Thinking about MADV_POPULATE vs. MADV_POPULATE_WRITE I wonder if it would be >> more versatile to break with existing MAP_POPULATE semantics and directly go >> with >> >> MADV_POPULATE_READ: simulate user space read access without actually >> reading. Trigger a read fault if required. >> >> MADV_POPULATE_WRITE: simulate user space write access without actually >> writing. Trigger a write fault if required. >> >> For my use case, I could use MADV_POPULATE_WRITE on anonymous memory and >> RAM-backed files (shmem/hugetlb) - I would not have a minor fault when the >> guest inside the VM first initializes memory. This mimics how QEMU currently >> preallocates memory. >> >> However, I would use MADV_POPULATE_READ on any !RAM-backed files where we >> actually have to write-back to a (slow?) device. Dirtying everything >> although the guest might not actually consume it in the near future might be >> undesired. > > Isn't what the current mm_populate does? > if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_SHARED)) == VM_WRITE) > gup_flags |= FOLL_WRITE; > > So it will write fault to shared memory mappings but it will touch > others. Exactly. But for hugetlbfs/shmem ("!RAM-backed files") this is not what we want. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb