Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:29:09 +0100
From:   Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e: Add binding to
 represent refclk to the connector
Message-ID: <YDPp5VS120Cc79ey@rocinante>
References: <20210222114030.26445-1-kishon@ti.com>
 <20210222114030.26445-2-kishon@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210222114030.26445-2-kishon@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kishon,

[...]
>    clocks:
> -    maxItems: 1
> -    description: clock-specifier to represent input to the PCIe
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    description: clock-specifier to represent input to the PCIe for 1 item.
> +      2nd item if present represents reference clock to the connector.
[...]

I am not an expert on device trees, but what do you think of making this
description to be as follows:

  description: |+
    clock-specifier to represent input to the PCIe for 1 item.
    2nd item if present represents reference clock to the connector.

What do you think?

Krzysztof