Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:41:58 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add lazor rev4
Message-ID: <YDRBRuUkrxCrLSeX@google.com>
References: <20210219181032.1.I23e12818c4a841ba9c37c60b3ba8cfeeb048285f@changeid>
 <CAD=FV=Vcsu1JREUgtEH1zXB7Ph8QWWYMVO2ioqqVYj9Dd79JDg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Vcsu1JREUgtEH1zXB7Ph8QWWYMVO2ioqqVYj9Dd79JDg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:20:53PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 6:11 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Lazor rev3 and older are stuffed with a 47k NTC thermistor for the
> > charger temperature which currently isn't supported by the PM6150 ADC
> > driver. A supported thermistor is used in rev4 and later revisions.
> > Add rev4 .dts files to be able to account for this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |  3 ++
> >  .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r3-kb.dts   |  4 +--
> >  .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r3-lte.dts  |  4 +--
> >  .../boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r3.dts |  4 +--
> >  .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r4-kb.dts   | 20 +++++++++++++
> >  .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r4-lte.dts  | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r4.dts | 16 +++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> From what I can see in the latest discussions -r4 _won't_ get stuffed
> with the 100K resistor.  Thus we can just treat -r4 as the same as all
> the other revisoins now, right?

Yes, looks like there is not need for an explicit -r4 after all.