Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2137778pxb; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:22:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/Km/kjmLVsz+SRlaiep8309KJLWx1O3cNWoauMJEuinH9ehXGnLyiEUScGE+e68wPJXfd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:39d9:: with SMTP id i25mr5278133eje.226.1614061329901; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:22:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614061329; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=E7RIPpnxKTFi+PkpOC0ma4U9bzIf9REJtg6QKaYR5Ol7zWehfZgfewmm8WaxMBbaOM TJd8wa5K9X3TqMcxD53DmjZ7XtGYwbCDSisvZIKrdL5AxJa+nzjzN0sx04leU6etW7yh IkBECOnuk1xlPc5hBzDodvJqgAEsVnVOnN5VQbH/X6sy56XMETa/WrCzf/wh7rI8NvnW lVPxHj4WjqAH6mCnW6qyUR442tQjfNZmeAUXnWmgbclTEFCNbvGK/IB8MlnsVVxctSCH LB3vj6BdX0CUkIRt22tcC0kmaO6rGD592idom5tNu/xXIyG8PeL6D1MDenBw+fvmYg+G V5Nw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=b+FnFHBqo235NjK2Sp3NrQCQQjRADju/2FyuZh4Zz98=; b=SQIFvMy/uSYpOyI8QtUMvz8Qj/WKVqo9nirIlrSDwQnDsyvUUwDs+KK66mKHGKC76I 3fN5xC+RoxiMJTZdtaU3fBM04eH0LFuMIXgU2q3fvIIE9vSDin4wmFSW2NsZjtT2N2WE hU1KfPZaJLUNBg9q/OtLWQkS0q8w+5uHEJZkqbi10LPHflP+T9OxmAz56kfEErLCUdTz 8Z0+yqV1DOAGPUXM9s5sRmSiuYqNPs1LTKkVx9c/stpZUIZV/EXkgEC+a3AHP4hCfP0q iPQT3s9qTH+JG5dKEaJRsozf8jIslhXBGQNXzoy8y172V1pz3HoaoHDp3iLvGgDoMz1x u1Dw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hr1si13938722ejc.438.2021.02.22.22.21.40; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230248AbhBWFbd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:31:33 -0500 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:56542 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229996AbhBWFbb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:31:31 -0500 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lEQHU-007ZbE-T2; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=fess.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1lEQHU-0002ip-7f; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:30:44 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Alexey Gladkov , LKML , io-uring , Kernel Hardening , Linux Containers , Linux-MM , Alexey Gladkov , Andrew Morton , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov References: Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 23:30:26 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:20:00 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1lEQHU-0002ip-7f;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/DYsNs7fzMb4RYxpfKS0P+rI9c6VJVdTw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4991] * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 363 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.7 (1.3%), b_tie_ro: 3.3 (0.9%), parse: 1.03 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 11 (3.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.26 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.5 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.05 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.91 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 124 (34.3%), check_bayes: 121 (33.4%), b_tokenize: 4.6 (1.3%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.8%), b_comp_prob: 1.65 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 105 (29.0%), b_finish: 0.78 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 203 (55.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.36 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 8 (2.1%), poll_dns_idle: 0.21 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.6 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 7 (2.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] Count rlimits in each user namespace X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 4:42 AM Alexey Gladkov wrote: >> >> These patches are for binding the rlimit counters to a user in user namespace. > > So this is now version 6, but I think the kernel test robot keeps > complaining about them causing KASAN issues. > > The complaints seem to change, so I'm hoping they get fixed, but it > does seem like every version there's a new one. Hmm? I have been keeping an eye on this as well, and yes the issues are getting fixed. My current plan is to aim at getting v7 rebased onto -rc1 into a branch. Review the changes very closely. Get some performance testing and some other testing against it. Then to get this code into linux-next. If everything goes smoothly I will send you a pull request next merge window. I have no intention of shipping this (or sending you a pull request) before it is ready. Eric