Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2388089pxb; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:05:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyq6kN1pAKjVhQ9z8vEia78ArJEImJIqwJ6oQuoldymvQSmtNlA2uZkHC3jjRRdl/sD5RGj X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d8da:: with SMTP id k26mr28240427eds.364.1614089101404; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:05:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614089101; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b6Nsnr0cbLKcs+lxLeNPCnU1WkKDd8hcd8JMVWsYuVzM6ONXr8RAk1CwiA3Rqdwh0F 3kY7edhGivVawFoQWkeRJacdD8Uatq8aeAAiGl/scsclQibfF1OjNki9Xg5isXGuqOmG NHsZ/YUY3IM4g8jeTD6XqYzFCHUZQG6MejQKZpDVEWGYj6E2ZL3ZBv+yXm8unJmnSnzK UUSCkEvgzJIRQ5lKadsf5sKEAzUS1vVz0VdV8bGRgX84oJOTOTLiZlocmRQ3nhiwcB10 8/RJpQYadGNLwFs4QLc+9fcrmf6UhyPvlnD05VJ1HILuysQ4mUdKEU8lDVOnpa8hNWCI 6msw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=Epderi1QkPwqwKBeAZe/Rq/ZQb3Wr4mU5fqNnb1yVro=; b=wkbSLWl+HG5YR8O0CowsWKEo0DrKoHbq+vc0JzoMv681Kf6OdrnlLCDBvakWXKVqb7 If8yZeo0A1MdZ5fCAdfRZ7fXx46cBzs0Xu+yVkMfbhNIp2+cImq1OvvqsC8jiUrlz/9s QepUKi9XV4eSJqDIGw+bTRKGWWYlr5mbrVkzs4P+jWU37ai7Ltr0f/zsZqMsPvY+X4qb myQoo6FZOZ5UOpJqKpmtb8iQG8F5pXT9mcL3hzzB+wDgSsZrENEoF3FfVhOwRaYBXYD3 KHxXQf5bU+mzYVwfoxxnNmfjQk/Muon1eJYxC9x4s5wV/GOdH036mdqVY2PFO5yO0CDw b93w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=3STMUkFa; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=DDSQnZeY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g11si5502871ejt.597.2021.02.23.06.04.36; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:05:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=3STMUkFa; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=DDSQnZeY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231347AbhBWKZS (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:25:18 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51128 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230142AbhBWKZH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:25:07 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1614075864; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Epderi1QkPwqwKBeAZe/Rq/ZQb3Wr4mU5fqNnb1yVro=; b=3STMUkFag5f3fNlRtB0YMOZ/CIaftEN2Fe5hxyoo2c1l3a5zxjknqqlOqeZbXPG2Cly7wV PHjU1/sFU5u1MHIK0tDwztutt6q7i+z3oVH9Cd2JQClz0kOkkWd8POkXPOO/xoGZbiDtvm egzD1ESpS+S61hj/u4b+HN2mXiTz/hF+pHVieM3MIhBLsFQPqOSEShDW1/sLLkQ2h/jBti HRInv1BArMWuONBHRDXXXNIXROt7TcDkwN541E0NDwHYccAVZCvrN/cFWxB6EN0ks2Xae/ 1iZZ8yLdWTg1Z+rWcozXRYlPCevlsyJwTHi0mwO9GbMjVYMWqh6K6o8DmNl5Kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1614075864; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Epderi1QkPwqwKBeAZe/Rq/ZQb3Wr4mU5fqNnb1yVro=; b=DDSQnZeYiiFnkeZZ66TOdXougGRMSdp+inqUGiDoxbBZj0e6xZV+t47CSILBrbGih/WPuK +xue+glqBtdMS0DA== To: Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org Cc: LKML , Andy Lutomirski , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry: Fix entry/exit mismatch on failed fast 32-bit syscalls In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:24:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg5n5bfr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 22 2021 at 21:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On a 32-bit fast syscall that fails to read its arguments from user > memory, the kernel currently does syscall exit work but not > syscall exit work. and this sentence does not make any sense. > This would confuse audit and ptrace. Would? It does confuse it, right? > This is a minimal fix intended for ease of backporting. A more > complete cleanup is coming. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 0b085e68f407 ("x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry") > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > --- > arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c > index 0904f5676e4d..cf4dcf346ca8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c > @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs) > regs->ax = -EFAULT; > > instrumentation_end(); > - syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs); > + local_irq_disable(); > + exit_to_user_mode(); While I suggested this with tired brain yesterday night, it's not really correct as it does not go through exit_to_user_mode_prepare() which it really has to. Thanks, tglx