Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2647913pxb; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:56:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjie0UPc8xXDKAt19kPHE+1yLBd2mjtfMcRlXrG19npWyq6tA8OSdWDLham5ma809hwggr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a0a:: with SMTP id w10mr28226119eju.551.1614110206306; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:56:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614110206; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uFKh71zRl5oyHzhMfXPx0DN/PEQQ0Xd2+ENb59X6fm4WsTGprk3AkJQYNT2mvQXpYl i5zryGVW/6GZI+yTllplFEe5HapwfmO8OVszAZIF7di3dihPGGvjH+U7N5zAzSb89yxK kJqdEREPPOFYALAMN1zOIHbjyUQ+W+HG7bYx6BgBcUndm1keEu/tTpDcXUfH2CPp5HUk ZfTNXpAy0IxpfuNBbj1v9KN/7luhXcU2DY9LgRyrKx7f8vyG6Nzlp0+7JvpMwv7IDNr/ R361Yv0oDtuHxBGx9mObC/9V1U0UDO0U84lbukgQOkQ8bB+8W684T3MvBttojRdt80UP wxlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=FJIy5VYftDFzcS1eI6DBNLyuIitPJ8z3PjzMyrSe9Dk=; b=dWX69Ly3PxIgs/8UnfoK9WLf+H6LZrVTVZ3mvjF9EvkRLBP4Zae1R8lIynnCj+jQH/ OiY4TSF2zA5YP9l27ignNTdYA3ySHgWF/F7tB4y29bn1PmpVBhkgnSTI6CACT2jmLNAV 3kYLK1MlBv5n+/GZ+UKZ2mZCyRKqWBOONnijOhS56rhR8X3Fs4YlYdnuEv57JUqLWQEH B60XIzITKoCHAlsAbjWMrxmldSo3MxWUsITGsjpIzSnM8ZeB3aJMwi4stSjvRGW8sc6x /X4LK0SUER/zSyl0gI0ok/yUIx3hNXIVwSQd2jVVUqY9lr4gRIuxt0HzxZLEVIYMe8Bw 9eKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MpBFGS8c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b20si1462453ejg.179.2021.02.23.11.56.21; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MpBFGS8c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232680AbhBWOQp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:16:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:53702 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231818AbhBWOQk (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:16:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614089712; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FJIy5VYftDFzcS1eI6DBNLyuIitPJ8z3PjzMyrSe9Dk=; b=MpBFGS8cJGrp3n0dhExmVOT9Y9QunFqlbJA3oTQ2s4g4+v5IOetrPDpFLSPvkfk7KcNtdF rXR12PQFaZbcXeGYOaL113X0CL0P6JBN0f9ojx8xj4FcVYT/w5+n6vaOVk+q4orqBCxAqG iKE5JdVUgZjWh35fMLLnSFo384YgxA0= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-580-USE3KM3IMR2FvObFgKt_bg-1; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:15:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: USE3KM3IMR2FvObFgKt_bg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id s192so1247304wme.6 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:15:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FJIy5VYftDFzcS1eI6DBNLyuIitPJ8z3PjzMyrSe9Dk=; b=qo+3uxP2HPKJiT+S+JAOMwaC+7zyKofbSqAmbhDue+aq42Rew8T/GuvsshMinp1dEl jMoUnEKisIgMd3ENbiQ4ZiItpc3v80efEKkvUENyVmVgZvosOtXysT7wVX8muWdmZH13 R3oyw/22jBCEOoS55q5Mr3/vcO+6Ag6ooO58eosH9yaG9h2dAkokqFVCAnYTc8lu/nTB m3kmpRJ6UTrsj92E4MfTQTVx+t4ae6Ozy+VayHS7S7n2/AyMBQ0bFPGIEpdFdrlzFfTg AIwOwtl2IWuoPH6PpdynksNH4t/tfQy5kQKQf2LevTDT0PpbECxfx9JnrAhlTztWW4rk Savg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53062kjXiXWhPGq1WX4ggQPqwODFbmX9ZKB4zvWWu2exYMjOe5d8 SLyc5LoxEe3IDXWPAmQXU6lweXzZ2IxGho6rzbnvagj/znNJXN81ox0oydamUhPKGvGcNV4NpeU lZbJv1O/wfl/wtJxf66B1kdQ9 X-Received: by 2002:adf:ab52:: with SMTP id r18mr1516304wrc.65.1614089708384; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:15:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:ab52:: with SMTP id r18mr1516282wrc.65.1614089708203; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from steredhat (host-79-34-249-199.business.telecomitalia.it. [79.34.249.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm31549861wrr.37.2021.02.23.06.15.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:15:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:15:04 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Arseny Krasnov Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jorgen Hansen , Norbert Slusarek , Andra Paraschiv , Colin Ian King , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stsp2@yandex.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 11/19] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET Message-ID: <20210223141504.eojm7kgcpswrez6j@steredhat> References: <20210218053347.1066159-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <20210218053940.1068164-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210218053940.1068164-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:39:37AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >This adds transport callback and it's logic for SEQPACKET dequeue. >Callback fetches RW packets from rx queue of socket until whole record >is copied(if user's buffer is full, user is not woken up). This is done >to not stall sender, because if we wake up user and it leaves syscall, >nobody will send credit update for rest of record, and sender will wait >for next enter of read syscall at receiver's side. So if user buffer is >full, we just send credit update and drop data. If during copy SEQ_BEGIN >was found(and not all data was copied), copying is restarted by reset >user's iov iterator(previous unfinished data is dropped). > >Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov >--- > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 10 +++ > include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 16 ++++ > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 140 insertions(+) This patch LGTM, maybe we only need to change 'msg_cnt' as we discussed on virtio-comment, but let's see if there are any other comments. > >diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h >b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h >index dc636b727179..003d06ae4a85 100644 >--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h >+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h >@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock { > u32 rx_bytes; > u32 buf_alloc; > struct list_head rx_queue; >+ >+ /* For SOCK_SEQPACKET */ >+ u32 user_read_seq_len; >+ u32 user_read_copied; >+ u32 curr_rx_msg_cnt; > }; > > struct virtio_vsock_pkt { >@@ -80,6 +85,11 @@ virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > struct msghdr *msg, > size_t len, int flags); > >+int >+virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, >+ struct msghdr *msg, >+ int flags, >+ bool *msg_ready); > s64 virtio_transport_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk); > s64 virtio_transport_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk); > >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >index 1d57ed3d84d2..cf9c165e5cca 100644 >--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >@@ -63,8 +63,14 @@ struct virtio_vsock_hdr { > __le32 fwd_cnt; > } __attribute__((packed)); > >+struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr { >+ __le32 msg_cnt; >+ __le32 msg_len; >+} __attribute__((packed)); >+ > enum virtio_vsock_type { > VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM = 1, >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET = 2, > }; > > enum virtio_vsock_op { >@@ -83,6 +89,11 @@ enum virtio_vsock_op { > VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_UPDATE = 6, > /* Request the peer to send the credit info to us */ > VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST = 7, >+ >+ /* Record begin for SOCK_SEQPACKET */ >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SEQ_BEGIN = 8, >+ /* Record end for SOCK_SEQPACKET */ >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SEQ_END = 9, > }; > > /* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SHUTDOWN flags values */ >@@ -91,4 +102,9 @@ enum virtio_vsock_shutdown { > VIRTIO_VSOCK_SHUTDOWN_SEND = 2, > }; > >+/* VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW flags values */ >+enum virtio_vsock_rw { >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_RW_EOR = 1, >+}; >+ > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */ >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c >index 833104b71a1c..d8ec2dfa2315 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c >@@ -393,6 +393,108 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > return err; > } > >+static inline void virtio_transport_remove_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt) >+{ >+ list_del(&pkt->list); >+ virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); >+} >+ >+static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, >+ struct msghdr *msg, >+ bool *msg_ready) >+{ >+ struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans; >+ struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; >+ int err = 0; >+ size_t user_buf_len = msg->msg_iter.count; >+ >+ *msg_ready = false; >+ spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); >+ >+ while (!*msg_ready && !list_empty(&vvs->rx_queue) && !err) { >+ pkt = list_first_entry(&vvs->rx_queue, struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list); >+ >+ switch (le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.op)) { >+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SEQ_BEGIN: { >+ /* Unexpected 'SEQ_BEGIN' during record copy: >+ * Leave receive loop, 'EAGAIN' will restart it from >+ * outer receive loop, packet is still in queue and >+ * counters are cleared. So in next loop enter, >+ * 'SEQ_BEGIN' will be dequeued first. User's iov >+ * iterator will be reset in outer loop. Also >+ * send credit update, because some bytes could be >+ * copied. User will never see unfinished record. >+ */ >+ err = -EAGAIN; >+ break; >+ } >+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SEQ_END: { >+ struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr *seq_hdr; >+ >+ seq_hdr = (struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr *)pkt->buf; >+ /* First check that whole record is received. */ >+ >+ if (vvs->user_read_copied != vvs->user_read_seq_len || >+ (le32_to_cpu(seq_hdr->msg_cnt) - vvs->curr_rx_msg_cnt) != 1) { >+ /* Tail of current record and head of next missed, >+ * so this EOR is from next record. Restart receive. >+ * Current record will be dropped, next headless will >+ * be dropped on next attempt to get record length. >+ */ >+ err = -EAGAIN; >+ } else { >+ /* Success. */ >+ *msg_ready = true; >+ } >+ >+ break; >+ } >+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW: { >+ size_t bytes_to_copy; >+ size_t pkt_len; >+ >+ pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len); >+ bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len); >+ >+ /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue. >+ * Unlock rx_lock since memcpy_to_msg() may sleep. >+ */ >+ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); >+ >+ if (memcpy_to_msg(msg, pkt->buf, bytes_to_copy)) { >+ spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); >+ err = -EINVAL; >+ break; >+ } >+ >+ spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); >+ user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy; >+ vvs->user_read_copied += pkt_len; >+ >+ if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_RW_EOR) >+ msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR; >+ break; >+ } >+ default: >+ ; >+ } >+ >+ /* For unexpected 'SEQ_BEGIN', keep such packet in queue, >+ * but drop any other type of packet. >+ */ >+ if (le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.op) != VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SEQ_BEGIN) { >+ virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt); >+ virtio_transport_remove_pkt(pkt); >+ } >+ } >+ >+ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock); >+ >+ virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk); >+ >+ return err; >+} >+ > ssize_t > virtio_transport_stream_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > struct msghdr *msg, >@@ -405,6 +507,18 @@ virtio_transport_stream_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_stream_dequeue); > >+int >+virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, >+ struct msghdr *msg, >+ int flags, bool *msg_ready) >+{ >+ if (flags & MSG_PEEK) >+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; >+ >+ return virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(vsk, msg, msg_ready); >+} >+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue); >+ > int > virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > struct msghdr *msg, >-- >2.25.1 >