Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To:     eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will@kernel.org,
        maz@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
        alex.williamson@redhat.com, tn@semihalf.com, zhukeqian1@huawei.com
Cc:     jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
        wangxingang5@huawei.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com,
        jean-philippe@linaro.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
        zhangfei.gao@gmail.com, vivek.gautam@arm.com,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
        nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, lushenming@huawei.com, vsethi@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 09/13] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 21:56:30 +0100
Message-Id: <20210223205634.604221-10-eric.auger@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210223205634.604221-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>
References: <20210223205634.604221-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

In nested mode we enforce the rule that all devices belonging
to the same iommu_domain share the same msi_domain.

Indeed if there were several physical MSI doorbells being used
within a single iommu_domain, it becomes really difficult to
resolve the nested stage mapping translating into the correct
physical doorbell. So let's forbid this situation.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index df3adc49111c..0cf92cd0ab3e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2429,6 +2429,37 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 	arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master);
 }
 
+static bool arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				      struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	struct irq_domain *irqd = dev_get_msi_domain(dev);
+	struct arm_smmu_master *master;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool share = false;
+
+	if (!irqd)
+		return true;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
+		struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(master->dev);
+
+		if (!d)
+			continue;
+		if (irqd != d) {
+			dev_info(dev, "Nested mode forbids to attach devices "
+				 "using different physical MSI doorbells "
+				 "to the same iommu_domain");
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+	}
+	share = true;
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
+	return share;
+}
+
 static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -2486,6 +2517,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
+	/*
+	 * In nested mode we must check all devices belonging to the
+	 * domain share the same physical MSI doorbell. Otherwise nested
+	 * stage MSI binding is not supported.
+	 */
+	if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED &&
+		!arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(domain, dev)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
 
 	master->domain = smmu_domain;
 
-- 
2.26.2