Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:27:30 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        hughd@google.com, hch@lst.de, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Overhaul multi-page lookups for THP
Message-ID: <20210223232730.GN2858050@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20201112212641.27837-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20210223145836.cb588a6ec6c34e54ad26f9bf@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210223145836.cb588a6ec6c34e54ad26f9bf@linux-foundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:58:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Do you feel this patchset is ready to merge up?

I think so.

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f6914405b49d9c9d@google.com/
> was addressed by 0060ef3b4e6dd ("mm: support THPs in
> zero_user_segments"), yes?

Correct.

> "mm/truncate,shmem: Handle truncates that split THPs" and "mm/filemap:
> Return only head pages from find_get_entries" were dropped.  I guess
> you'll be having another go at those sometime?

That's right.

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20201114100648.GI19102@lst.de/
> wasn't responded to?

It didn't really seem worth replying to ... I'm not particularly
sympathetic to "please refactor the patch series" when there's no
compelling reason, and having a large function inlined really isn't a
problem when it only has one caller.