Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:49:45 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Dorst <opensource@vdorst.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mt7530: support MDB operations
Message-ID: <20210223154945.7723cd35@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210222100717.451-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
References: <20210222100717.451-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:07:17 +0800 DENG Qingfang wrote:
> Support port MDB add to/delete from MT7530 ARL.
> 
> As the hardware can manage multicast forwarding itself, trapping
> multicast traffic to the CPU is no longer required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>

# Form letter - net-next is closed

We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.12 and therefore
net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and
optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.12-rc1 is cut.

Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check:
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.