Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp241967pxb; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:23:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwW3JOVmbQg71mWVTkCDzorNMBZK88CrF+zxVUsArdkorNv3/lKgSqxoSPdOKeA4siF/FUr X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3096:: with SMTP id de22mr1056832edb.141.1614154999926; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:23:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614154999; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bw86RljjBzOXh/BFgA46ew/56aGJR/JmTcJv+vOpbam+NSqkHLJijSH1h0Lc2C04wn +uxr8zNDblTm2/x3+df9tZZxcHpr7iREd2aROzUZgBGGsrn2qdz4cjJmR5kjKt3YXCMc 5/YY32DWacdKw5+0WmdEqtXWkPR+Oy/41jALOC4aWdI6tV/6MUhBsITQlbirFYbrSPSD NABjwxVBeU7uSikMagn4SlZZF+efQ4d5JwmZW8LbB31CCiSMMGua58JQ17qEm8SOCFy4 wc/g9+LiObxZCsBJleJuagmniSEZNz1lqYxBHQe2PHCWXYxt8l7E5x2wqpLjWMFMXNmN oF0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=Lp0FE1WV9QJoOhhMKz9OtQnsBBrAcMgv0F3rjqPCqUo=; b=dHzJCjbeoV1/qdK+bOEW3CzGqQB4B9jVi4GKhrCtlSUvvhKvjpOVVJl5UbwpXpuhMx +U+iG2sSv/G9cm8UKUVBQtKtUeZPrRGNEBC3yCAueoeBk9VHCcxTTiPpdislP+iG60lO Gt+galvZjCcPkcoyyqY37iuFrhvJQ7UWG1cNprR5huOnt38aqaqSgDPCQ2cKBdhOmbDB U6DMgGH9tR8xD/L+SBascXuU6WvZgSzPdUzjVdg5m3MzhoH9rygI2aIcZFHluNdyAwTJ t17CI2JwUnOvuGV425rxFeadrE46JMC6e+XUh3881vVvCoKX3ONoIA2g7U7bgP7JweBf tMYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si742947edd.589.2021.02.24.00.22.56; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233435AbhBXHi5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:38:57 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:56573 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231326AbhBXHi4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:38:56 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.210.203.113 Received: from xps13 (lfbn-tou-1-972-113.w86-210.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.210.203.113]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F5CF20009; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:38:05 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: =?UTF-8?B?w4FsdmFybyBGZXJuw6FuZGV6?= Rojas Cc: Florian Fainelli , Brian Norris , Kamal Dasu , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nand: brcmnand: fix OOB R/W with Hamming ECC Message-ID: <20210224083805.34f625a0@xps13> In-Reply-To: <0670B343-C39E-4610-8061-A7F81F90B9F4@gmail.com> References: <20210222201655.32361-1-noltari@gmail.com> <32837cb2-f7ba-d59e-de66-051019b21e89@gmail.com> <0670B343-C39E-4610-8061-A7F81F90B9F4@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Álvaro, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote on Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:16:58 +0100: > Hi Florian, > > > El 24 feb 2021, a las 4:46, Florian Fainelli escribió: > > > > > > > > On 2/22/2021 12:16 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: > >> Hamming ECC doesn't cover the OOB data, so reading or writing OOB shall > >> always be done without ECC enabled. > >> This is a problem when adding JFFS2 cleanmarkers to erased blocks. If JFFS2 > >> clenmarkers are added to the OOB with ECC enabled, OOB bytes will be changed > >> from ff ff ff to 00 00 00, reporting incorrect ECC errors. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas > > > > Should there be a Fixes: tag provided here for back porting to stable trees? > > I think so, but the fixed commit would be the first one, right? > 27c5b17cd1b10564fa36f8f51e4b4b41436ecc32 Yep, shouldn't be a problem. Thanks, Miquèl