Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp380544pxb; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:55:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9mwowim1BzQ9+sOjrHrLHzKP1AuQTwaxvPWz0vARRb1XIU1QNFrMqeUkj9Y46PzYhoUts X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3916:: with SMTP id f22mr31040791eje.328.1614171317984; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:55:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614171317; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DVqhipJ9XwTh5RjTcAMR0SEeEi7l6/TlZjDfKk5ZH1lwAPCTVKhtEyBtBwhjo4ssQn R+Y6l+uw2zM4v1m3lqp4BcPSxVHFeD7pSMfdVXUheLz3YkZ9znMG+eN3tHogofujkFE+ w5gD0vVdrme7sxqP1rmff6uDT5ZgCoZZA+rsad9ByKglc7y2LAS6owmaYqdqhwx+rI78 ewREGC2Ih5VSq0B51hUMQ55hCovJ9wF8xAONVxAXYOWSCFnnjhZJZ2SxsYP0/FlSLEuC dwpkEK6yrtd03GGtYx2BNqCUj6BZgj0MF6izftliqoUW4w2F41EqxG1Is8knmfBC35RP D9Gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=SrFMsb94vi7hpDJMqK4fNRwcw8r8Q/1jRcohhOym2YA=; b=F0FzvIQiuN8QY1s3BbVYhvLsxD01Q4bCbYOGnYpaMcdyOlbC+QqxENRUgxhDkAXaGZ qAfgg0wTH+rWjuU60WpDlIRtDD/DbaSJ0C0q+icpklPB9K2qzA3Pyrj2vk4YALdgfGIG cg4nMuCjgXOI1SJI8iIY7T7A20HNCekIVTE6ldSGNtbZnsPekNLfIkTuYMbmyCxcxs4Y sO1bJ1mA9JAG4rxG2hhkBqVH0XWLUJoxcGnTpVsPQ34zZ5xklIXSnEVqUR6JaM3OnKmi fz6S/g0rk6ilbh9BrVNIYoyR0GKzwKoU7aWO+GfIVEGw/6oWChP3oxfvCjfO1AYXGSJW bxlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UASjuIYZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g13si1286628ejo.464.2021.02.24.04.54.47; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UASjuIYZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234234AbhBXGsJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:48:09 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:50340 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234228AbhBXGsH (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:48:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614149199; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SrFMsb94vi7hpDJMqK4fNRwcw8r8Q/1jRcohhOym2YA=; b=UASjuIYZ63oiW4K/YXv1ECivn5p/8xyHVX1+LWVfz0y8TySV8/fngjbM1tZGttcBtqthT/ cqqXKr3Xz5DyuJ7Jb89c38NlPmhE4aPSUAXSdYX7mYWJaXUgbfzlA1eq9VdPm2fzJBF4xM zXD2ygfXxzArjdNJ4YDhmBAMt+dHrzQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-161-AJcoi-V8NEOaPx56bLWKIw-1; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:46:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: AJcoi-V8NEOaPx56bLWKIw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id d7so588458wri.23 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:46:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=SrFMsb94vi7hpDJMqK4fNRwcw8r8Q/1jRcohhOym2YA=; b=HUo4c81/5gne6rvSJ1OHwcMsouicKEZrmUIzY5m3JwKPIQsQASp9S4kxifqX0KN0aU wbHjVGlZKatx9OQVRw6P4cKhV+ejPdzRZQ0HXcdmh2IO7r36fQjDwx3cS85uHo66N6or B7VywDlULR1/Co7QWLycuBYRaBw3JWYtDZ948n6fShMOlEdU0UxHpq92L/KgMX94VG2s oyheKTYO60pgOC/sXeFwYzWVv1QhiD2IuRXtnOuWIKT3d5zp6ogtiD4GUdmfSMqYxts1 TRtD/Hc5hjYITW9GcVdwJmEYLcRtyckE2cLGNOmVfu4XMMPW1/ozLSzU1LTIH3zWfqD5 oBvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RBkW87n49u4pmjtIXvN4ZQNx92dKfNCSd5S7uXKhxJwQQlx4T 8ouxu0JBEpNTFTSLOgn8Bu8dmzAkA4Ck4/5O+GrEaLbkIePPsZ2NoPSm9kp4k8512WSOqZ1+7KB VYFjFvZSzPI5OwqDbOmBTxMdJ X-Received: by 2002:adf:d0c5:: with SMTP id z5mr8150867wrh.289.1614149196913; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:46:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:d0c5:: with SMTP id z5mr8150856wrh.289.1614149196761; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-180-2-31.red.bezeqint.net. [79.180.2.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm1141060wmq.12.2021.02.23.22.46.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:46:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:46:33 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: Si-Wei Liu , elic@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Message-ID: <20210224014232-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1613735698-3328-1-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com> <605e7d2d-4f27-9688-17a8-d57191752ee7@redhat.com> <20210222023040-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <22fe5923-635b-59f0-7643-2fd5876937c2@oracle.com> <20210223082536-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <3ff5fd23-1db0-2f95-4cf9-711ef403fb62@oracle.com> <20210224000057-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <0559fd8c-ff44-cb7a-8a74-71976dd2ee33@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0559fd8c-ff44-cb7a-8a74-71976dd2ee33@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 02:04:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2021/2/24 1:04 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:35:57AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > On 2/23/2021 5:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2021/2/23 9:12 上午, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > On 2/21/2021 11:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:14:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2021/2/19 7:54 下午, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > > Commit 452639a64ad8 ("vdpa: make sure set_features is invoked > > > > > > > > > for legacy") made an exception for legacy guests to reset > > > > > > > > > features to 0, when config space is accessed before features > > > > > > > > > are set. We should relieve the verify_min_features() check > > > > > > > > > and allow features reset to 0 for this case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's worth noting that not just legacy guests could access > > > > > > > > > config space before features are set. For instance, when > > > > > > > > > feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is advertised some modern driver > > > > > > > > > will try to access and validate the MTU present in the config > > > > > > > > > space before virtio features are set. > > > > > > > > This looks like a spec violation: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following driver-read-only field, mtu only exists if > > > > > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is > > > > > > > > set. > > > > > > > > This field specifies the maximum MTU for the driver to use. > > > > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we really want to workaround this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > And also: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device: > > > > > > > 1. Reset the device. > > > > > > > 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device. > > > > > > > 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the > > > > > > > device. > > > > > > > 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits > > > > > > > understood by the OS and driver to the > > > > > > > device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) > > > > > > > the device-specific configuration > > > > > > > fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it. > > > > > > > 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new > > > > > > > feature bits after this step. > > > > > > > 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: > > > > > > > otherwise, the device does not > > > > > > > support our subset of features and the device is unusable. > > > > > > > 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues > > > > > > > for the device, optional per-bus setup, > > > > > > > reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration > > > > > > > space, and population of virtqueues. > > > > > > > 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so accessing config space before FEATURES_OK is a spec violation, right? > > > > > > It is, but it's not relevant to what this commit tries to address. I > > > > > > thought the legacy guest still needs to be supported. > > > > > > > > > > > > Having said, a separate patch has to be posted to fix the guest driver > > > > > > issue where this discrepancy is introduced to virtnet_validate() (since > > > > > > commit fe36cbe067). But it's not technically related to this patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Siwei > > > > > I think it's a bug to read config space in validate, we should move it to > > > > > virtnet_probe(). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > I take it back, reading but not writing seems to be explicitly allowed by spec. > > > > So our way to detect a legacy guest is bogus, need to think what is > > > > the best way to handle this. > > > Then maybe revert commit fe36cbe067 and friends, and have QEMU detect legacy > > > guest? Supposedly only config space write access needs to be guarded before > > > setting FEATURES_OK. > > > > > > -Siwie > > Detecting it isn't enough though, we will need a new ioctl to notify > > the kernel that it's a legacy guest. Ugh :( > > > I'm not sure I get this, how can we know if there's a legacy driver before > set_features()? qemu knows for sure. It does not communicate this information to the kernel right now unfortunately. > And I wonder what will hapeen if we just revert the set_features(0)? > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rejecting reset to 0 > > > > > > > > > prematurely causes correct MTU and link status unable to load > > > > > > > > > for the very first config space access, rendering issues like > > > > > > > > > guest showing inaccurate MTU value, or failure to reject > > > > > > > > > out-of-range MTU. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for > > > > > > > > > supported mlx5 devices") > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > >    drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 15 +-------------- > > > > > > > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > index 7c1f789..540dd67 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -1490,14 +1490,6 @@ static u64 > > > > > > > > > mlx5_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev) > > > > > > > > >        return mvdev->mlx_features; > > > > > > > > >    } > > > > > > > > > -static int verify_min_features(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, > > > > > > > > > u64 features) > > > > > > > > > -{ > > > > > > > > > -    if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) > > > > > > > > > -        return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > -    return 0; > > > > > > > > > -} > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > >    static int setup_virtqueues(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev) > > > > > > > > >    { > > > > > > > > >        int err; > > > > > > > > > @@ -1558,18 +1550,13 @@ static int > > > > > > > > > mlx5_vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 > > > > > > > > > features) > > > > > > > > >    { > > > > > > > > >        struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev); > > > > > > > > >        struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev); > > > > > > > > > -    int err; > > > > > > > > >        print_features(mvdev, features, true); > > > > > > > > > -    err = verify_min_features(mvdev, features); > > > > > > > > > -    if (err) > > > > > > > > > -        return err; > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > >        ndev->mvdev.actual_features = features & > > > > > > > > > ndev->mvdev.mlx_features; > > > > > > > > >        ndev->config.mtu = cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, ndev->mtu); > > > > > > > > >        ndev->config.status |= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, > > > > > > > > > VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP); > > > > > > > > > -    return err; > > > > > > > > > +    return 0; > > > > > > > > >    } > > > > > > > > >    static void mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb(struct vdpa_device > > > > > > > > > *vdev, struct vdpa_callback *cb)