Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp633581pxb; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK99BEjQ1RqQMkBiu+l/KK7cj4/bffe9CGGQPy+9hQn1H9liKUPjobLJ/07/Yl1EBlyjHp X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4955:: with SMTP id f21mr1936056ejt.74.1614192137167; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614192137; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xbYuZ8iAh+7K/ZDDpn77lFS3Vc/kF+mnOeVFI/PqwbbRwPaRNmUvPICY5a4PhDniRE DlO8BDR1VMCb99QbYk1bKY3SBQrEnCZvjVv542i3lv87JV01juJNVoeO80WW+/CChafY v7ULaJ0L/VOenUCHsyF6JJa+X2POsddPJAk7u49/S0NIC4fUUUdd22cr/gXpDOjp+Ay5 J6EYWsooDLy9VoscAIMCEj1wUXPQkQGHm+4qzOIje4aaIpah/phfx9kuefNWzYFPZ/hJ iQH61PvjzAaVxkZVtrpUl2W7W3NuM58wy8ur8m0m6bnEyqjteEsUOwl4kOas9rzchdap cKYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Qy16bGiTG/3vBHgz9BBQUGLnI+0LdYym3ReO16SMo6g=; b=eKWRJdhIF/ytoOiPbHw7o1OGBbdw/VawLewEjNR9juCKRLtPDcRLmPb5a4GWmOyir4 r2ErJ4FXp+Fv9lRIZRUb8gehl/bU1dB2sVDzlxOXfLbwAd9h/MnuirPV2Sck/bLlkDoe Dm++IxOVE0tHQuIJjpmHGrJwYqEhsyImkxDaEzh5FljH8x5qodWxOmBGIQ5JQYmKvGKa aOLOTEGCq9vtcXt3mLL58PhIJS+HTXpXPJhmgRH7erqpurKdmcvwt68v1kuj0l9vtuKG XlPkaDY1SHrCJERD8+bBZ4PzA25bvEIi1PcVejIftRBJ3BzM99GGCrBfWzfGeQHTS/U+ jxsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e22si1661718edu.45.2021.02.24.10.41.52; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:42:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234502AbhBXSjg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:39:36 -0500 Received: from raptor.unsafe.ru ([5.9.43.93]:51808 "EHLO raptor.unsafe.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232661AbhBXSjf (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:39:35 -0500 Received: from example.org (ip-94-113-225-162.net.upcbroadband.cz [94.113.225.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by raptor.unsafe.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C85520460; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:38:28 +0100 From: Alexey Gladkov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: kernel test robot , 0day robot , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Hardening , Linux Containers , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: d28296d248: stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_per_sec -82.7% regression Message-ID: <20210224183828.j6uut6sholeo2fzh@example.org> References: <20210224051845.GB6114@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.1 (raptor.unsafe.ru [5.9.43.93]); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:54:17AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > kernel test robot writes: > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed a -82.7% regression of stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_per_sec due to commit: > > > > > > commit: d28296d2484fa11e94dff65e93eb25802a443d47 ("[PATCH v7 5/7] Reimplement RLIMIT_SIGPENDING on top of ucounts") > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexey-Gladkov/Count-rlimits-in-each-user-namespace/20210222-175836 > > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next > > > > in testcase: stress-ng > > on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 112G memory > > with following parameters: > > > > nr_threads: 100% > > disk: 1HDD > > testtime: 60s > > class: interrupt > > test: sigsegv > > cpufreq_governor: performance > > ucode: 0x42e > > > > > > In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the > > following tests: > > Thank you. Now we have a sense of where we need to test the performance > of these changes carefully. One of the reasons for this is that I rolled back the patch that changed the ucounts.count type to atomic_t. Now get_ucounts() is forced to use a spin_lock to increase the reference count. -- Rgrds, legion