Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp271913pxb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:59:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVVvA5vK68XPtxj15tHrNjHcVRSvUK+MiZTaT9O5zp/hydse/yu1BEmZMQZLGkOtOEH0nm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b055:: with SMTP id bj21mr1889518ejb.355.1614247182847; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:59:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614247182; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0FjKV/n3oDE9KbGoYSFtliiSKlCsvCQMB7GYlpRc0arMsf+cfZZSVBF2ycMyNSdGrK HZFKhKC/sLmwH8JyDK8oe8x+ZfoPvIr1jiHgeL4ES1nLGeYiwSQcNZq+iqUSm6EKPcNq 2zGATTcfimPpIlGHu8IPH1YkG0xYjt7BsxQzh1cbuqvI9eqFQ7iY/3ynUQJ9iyVueJb1 OXH7vJMM2TIqggDLUkVuORYqkf5SOwNhTnwju/xl6QIi2dWmQRaZv1LIb6vE6tloHyqY zrcNSK9w559ndk3YIN4ZcX1cHLL4QL4tOrfoarbGMh7jx4zj68z2xRzmCQX9SzFer+dc 2Gyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=0FlUQr7NXdEj/xVvlu/JuabXmhrP+y/RbOIFqc3B2J8=; b=e/miMC/pLvRSr40RuWuP5vXYj1wcqjzYfW6Dkhu795KZw8dk9DU/yycUk+Qok9sEE7 jY9F+VQN9JWzLhQ/4NbAiftAMbjamiY4CglLuWkYyoBqhVT0ctkNwXcoOv6XmG3Rtc+L RJ4ppBBN4x37rFpXr674gxam1/Y71hXDm0UAFBXSUX0SjeYXH4wOn6iGibrrYDclGXtj WUYicEw8bTLIS53XGK9eMMDkzgtlkKwippaldnMJFlO3Rerqzr9YxrVezGJZNdjoE71n 627//vWbeQdSVVom53NrIZLoywuf4b+0Uf/2D8NfICDuUIluwTtfq5oc+2I6MnMG6wic bLYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bl4si3255843ejb.47.2021.02.25.01.59.20; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236184AbhBYJLl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:11:41 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:39722 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236089AbhBYJIj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:08:39 -0500 Received: from [95.90.166.74] (helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFCcS-0000It-Tw; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:07:36 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: sboyd@kernel.org, "elaine.zhang" Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com, finley.xiao@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] clk: rockchip: support more core div setting Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <3100125.44csPzL39Z@diego> In-Reply-To: <6759a56c-56d1-da63-5299-0d76966329df@rock-chips.com> References: <20210223095352.11544-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com> <5312231.BaHzMo0RvP@diego> <6759a56c-56d1-da63-5299-0d76966329df@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Elaine, Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021, 03:59:32 CET schrieb elaine.zhang: > 在 2021/2/23 下午6:22, Heiko Stübner 写道: > > Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2021, 10:53:51 CET schrieb Elaine Zhang: > >> A55 supports each core to work at different frequencies, and each core > >> has an independent divider control. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang > >> --- > >> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > >> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c > >> index fa9027fb1920..cac06f4f7573 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c > >> @@ -164,6 +164,18 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk, > >> reg_data->mux_core_mask, > >> reg_data->mux_core_shift), > >> cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core_reg); > >> + if (reg_data->core1_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(alt_div, reg_data->div_core1_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core1_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core1_reg); > >> + if (reg_data->core2_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(alt_div, reg_data->div_core2_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core2_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core2_reg); > >> + if (reg_data->core3_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(alt_div, reg_data->div_core3_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core3_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core3_reg); > > for (i = 0; i < reg_data->num_cores; i++) > > writel(...) > > > >> } else { > >> /* select alternate parent */ > >> writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(reg_data->mux_core_alt, > >> @@ -209,6 +221,19 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk, > >> reg_data->mux_core_shift), > >> cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core_reg); > >> > >> + if (reg_data->core1_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, reg_data->div_core1_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core1_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core1_reg); > >> + if (reg_data->core2_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, reg_data->div_core2_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core2_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core2_reg); > >> + if (reg_data->core3_reg) > >> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, reg_data->div_core3_mask, > >> + reg_data->div_core3_shift), > >> + cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core3_reg); > >> + > > for (i = 0; i < reg_data->num_cores; i++) > > writel(...) > > > >> if (ndata->old_rate > ndata->new_rate) > >> rockchip_cpuclk_set_dividers(cpuclk, rate); > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h > >> index 2271a84124b0..b46c93fd0cb5 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h > >> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct rockchip_cpuclk_clksel { > >> u32 val; > >> }; > >> > >> -#define ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_NUM_DIVIDERS 2 > >> +#define ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_NUM_DIVIDERS 5 > > please move this into a separate patch, as yes the rk3568 needs more > > dividers but that isn't related to adding separate core divider controls. > > > > [...] > > add > > > > #define ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_MAX_CORES 4 > > > >> struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table { > >> unsigned long prate; > >> struct rockchip_cpuclk_clksel divs[ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_NUM_DIVIDERS]; > >> @@ -333,6 +333,12 @@ struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table { > >> * @core_reg: register offset of the core settings register > >> * @div_core_shift: core divider offset used to divide the pll value > >> * @div_core_mask: core divider mask > >> + * @div_core1_shift: core1 divider offset used to divide the pll value > >> + * @div_core1_mask: core1 divider mask > >> + * @div_core2_shift: core2 divider offset used to divide the pll value > >> + * @div_core2_mask: core2 divider mask > >> + * @div_core3_shift: core3 divider offset used to divide the pll value > >> + * @div_core3_mask: core3 divider mask > >> * @mux_core_alt: mux value to select alternate parent > >> * @mux_core_main: mux value to select main parent of core > >> * @mux_core_shift: offset of the core multiplexer > >> @@ -342,6 +348,15 @@ struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data { > >> int core_reg; > >> u8 div_core_shift; > >> u32 div_core_mask; > >> + int core1_reg; > >> + u8 div_core1_shift; > >> + u32 div_core1_mask; > >> + int core2_reg; > >> + u8 div_core2_shift; > >> + u32 div_core2_mask; > >> + int core3_reg; > >> + u8 div_core3_shift; > >> + u32 div_core3_mask; > > please make this instead like: > > > > int core_reg[ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_MAX_CORES]; > > u8 div_core_shift[ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_MAX_CORES]; > > u32 div_core_mask[ROCKCHIP_CPUCLK_MAX_CORES]; > > int num_cores; > > This is also my original intention, but with such modification, other > SOCs of RK need to be modified, otherwise they cannot be compatible with > the old SOC. That is actually no problem, especially as the diff should be just a simple static const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data px30_cpuclk_data = { - .core_reg = PX30_CLKSEL_CON(0), - .div_core_shift = 0, - .div_core_mask = 0xf, + .core_reg[0] = PX30_CLKSEL_CON(0), + .div_core_shift[0] = 0, + .div_core_mask[0] = 0xf, + .num_cores = 1, .mux_core_alt = 1, .mux_core_main = 0, .mux_core_shift = 7, .mux_core_mask = 0x1, }; So please go the clean way :-) Thanks Heiko