Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp593189pxb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:57:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnWVPjuSCDzE+eM+aozIZMhSEsiuuV2wyoQ0VJY1j7XxcIqt3+s0ylzIOwp7zDGaf8sMRg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af6f:: with SMTP id os15mr3785229ejb.279.1614275845927; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:57:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614275845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uwPeyaZV9awOPVm8Cp2lMOQnw1HmgCY44yWCZ/HchSTUQgInJDEZG/8eEaX6f/ovOa +naN2AbvKHe7pZunmGPWqoLNbnmEAL2gjSM6+6fHWaUrOg8HrbAxa7pfoFMexHU/X+4L JtE/lFYchj/eW2nyMf9XrpoOciU1z/xtxBm2XkZEwrezwevbpDobEuaQ1EZS8Culjb/m Lg9IFwerQZQSmyOYM8I5L2rIW+BSCnziRKmOUIIzg74BDmIF4nn64qsLgdPbTHFX6RLr Mysz0H20Ougx3UoN0PoIYFl4qLRKdf4jBa0cnA895Ohz0V9I57nxPiRM4fn4Qf7yt8z6 fmGw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Dj0Pa8aF0tC5Uv5BuKgWwY3C1VrzZLxPJIwF5G/jwvk=; b=WJbWkEAtBQCOwmxHYAMNsckNyZL7R8Wi3rLOGGTyiCJtTqXRGahybDyv+P6P2CbjL/ qXof5KsHPFBeUsVJg9EsfjUDdfuf6oZpcO7ovcbJF/q36ab963hD5oJylvpyR/tPESXq vM/y7fQTyGywm6DgtUwclXhpKemFgcIhU0I6aVSRWhSMLy37hxF6QYlqUQ+XbIDePRnQ M6epw5W+5sAnJjwH1HTu0aCPtifKjF2gUyIx/ASQadDYYRSIdxwxzIZXRUpSFBqXSzfK WuZZUy3mObuGQllFBju3hS3YwhttlZw6jUVUN57m78ARCycTe+fnT5FEk6LKDVdGRKbz IAAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jLpmAJ+H; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si3595407edv.36.2021.02.25.09.57.03; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:57:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=jLpmAJ+H; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229886AbhBYRyv (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:54:51 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:19878 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232465AbhBYRvZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:51:25 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PHYDt1066795; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=Dj0Pa8aF0tC5Uv5BuKgWwY3C1VrzZLxPJIwF5G/jwvk=; b=jLpmAJ+HQOcNz/W7ybTjCwVvp0F0pfeN2HvTs0Qf7IWf2ppJ+/gIPlkIKOtqrD/TyAs5 V1oeVnwBOx3p0HCx+fsBbxtz2IkY4jDKYxe+cIEU3Q1yp1P3veZO4EzwnDp/74diRO+l exJL27RMnxwai9DLF7FXfxibFPTvSamhDpER9SSPFALItWE9ZkrSO6FjFxZZpgZnRs/H /WDV7YULKL2bn4vmsF+bYGfv93lsjRttvAQyut1kl/MipuBZ+o5FEXIz3ClmK8w05Tv9 bwvKSJWKntevdYanBdcF8SNSAno2GCJ2B9wfAJIGzer5iMRrPhYqGQMNxBwzExH2t6gN ig== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xe106cj5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:16 -0500 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11PHa19U072619; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:16 -0500 Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36xe106ch5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:15 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11PHi6BY012014; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:50:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36tt28aekq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:50:13 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11PHoAmD36765968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:50:10 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28985205A; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:50:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.51.238]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E438852078; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:50:06 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:50:04 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: George Kennedy Cc: David Hildenbrand , Andrey Konovalov , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Vincenzo Frascino , Dmitry Vyukov , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Will Deacon , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Peter Collingbourne , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , Christoph Hellwig , kasan-dev , Linux ARM , Linux Memory Management List , LKML , Dhaval Giani Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory Message-ID: <20210225175004.GG1854360@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210223213237.GI1741768@linux.ibm.com> <450a9895-a2b4-d11b-97ca-1bd33d5308d4@oracle.com> <20210224103754.GA1854360@linux.ibm.com> <9b7251d1-7b90-db4f-fa5e-80165e1cbb4b@oracle.com> <20210225085300.GB1854360@linux.ibm.com> <9973d0e2-e28b-3f8a-5f5d-9d142080d141@oracle.com> <20210225145700.GC1854360@linux.ibm.com> <20210225160706.GD1854360@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-25_10:2021-02-24,2021-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250133 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:31:04AM -0500, George Kennedy wrote: > > > On 2/25/2021 11:07 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:22:44AM -0500, George Kennedy wrote: > > > > > > > On 2/24/2021 5:37 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > Applied just your latest patch, but same failure. > > > > > > I thought there was an earlier comment (which I can't find now) that stated > > > that memblock_reserve() wouldn't reserve the page, which is what's needed > > > here. > > Actually, I think that memblock_reserve() should be just fine, but it seems > > I'm missing something in address calculation each time. > > > > What would happen if you stuck > > > > memblock_reserve(0xbe453000, PAGE_SIZE); > > > > say, at the beginning of find_ibft_region()? > > Added debug to your patch and this is all that shows up. Looks like the > patch is in the wrong place as acpi_tb_parse_root_table() is only called for > the RSDP address. Right, but I think it parses table description of the other tables and populates local tables with them. I think the problem is with how I compare the signatures, please see below > [??? 0.064317] ACPI: Early table checksum verification disabled > [??? 0.065437] XXX acpi_tb_parse_root_table: rsdp_address=bfbfa014 > [??? 0.066612] ACPI: RSDP 0x00000000BFBFA014 000024 (v02 BOCHS ) > [??? 0.067759] ACPI: XSDT 0x00000000BFBF90E8 00004C (v01 BOCHS BXPCFACP > 00000001????? 01000013) > [??? 0.069470] ACPI: FACP 0x00000000BFBF5000 000074 (v01 BOCHS BXPCFACP > 00000001 BXPC 00000001) > [??? 0.071183] ACPI: DSDT 0x00000000BFBF6000 00238D (v01 BOCHS BXPCDSDT > 00000001 BXPC 00000001) > [??? 0.072876] ACPI: FACS 0x00000000BFBFD000 000040 > [??? 0.073806] ACPI: APIC 0x00000000BFBF4000 000090 (v01 BOCHS BXPCAPIC > 00000001 BXPC 00000001) > [??? 0.075501] ACPI: HPET 0x00000000BFBF3000 000038 (v01 BOCHS BXPCHPET > 00000001 BXPC 00000001) > [??? 0.077194] ACPI: BGRT 0x00000000BE49B000 000038 (v01 INTEL EDK2???? > 00000002????? 01000013) > [??? 0.078880] ACPI: iBFT 0x00000000BE453000 000800 (v01 BOCHS BXPCFACP > 00000000????? 00000000) > [??? 0.080588] ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > index dfe1ac3..603b3a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > ? * > *****************************************************************************/ > > +#include > + > ?#include > ?#include "accommon.h" > ?#include "actables.h" > @@ -232,6 +234,8 @@ struct acpi_table_header *acpi_tb_copy_dsdt(u32 > table_index) > ???? acpi_status status; > ???? u32 table_index; > > +printk(KERN_ERR "XXX acpi_tb_parse_root_table: rsdp_address=%llx\n", > rsdp_address); > + > ???? ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(tb_parse_root_table); > > ???? /* Map the entire RSDP and extract the address of the RSDT or XSDT */ > @@ -339,6 +343,22 @@ struct acpi_table_header *acpi_tb_copy_dsdt(u32 > table_index) > ???? ??? ??? acpi_tb_parse_fadt(); > ???? ??? } > > +??? ??? if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && > +??? ??? ??? ACPI_COMPARE_NAMESEG(&acpi_gbl_root_table_list. > +??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?tables[table_index].signature, > +??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?ACPI_SIG_IBFT)) { We have: include/acpi/actbl1.h:#define ACPI_SIG_IBFT "IBFT" /* iSCSI Boot Firmware Table */ and the BIOS uses "iBFT", so we need to loop over possible signature variants like iscsi_ibft_find does. Do you mind replacing ACPI_SIG_IBFT with "iBFT" and try again? > +??? ??? ??? struct acpi_table_header *ibft; > +??? ??? ??? struct acpi_table_desc *desc; > + > +??? ??? ??? desc = &acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[table_index]; > +??? ??? ??? status = acpi_tb_get_table(desc, &ibft); > +??? ??? ??? if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { > +printk(KERN_ERR "XXX acpi_tb_parse_root_table(calling memblock_reserve()): > addres=%llx, ibft->length=%x\n", address, ibft->length); > +??? ??? ??? ??? memblock_reserve(address, ibft->length); > +??? ??? ??? ??? acpi_tb_put_table(desc); > +??? ??? ??? } > +??? ??? } > + > ?next_table: > > ???? ??? table_entry += table_entry_size; > > > > > [?? 30.308229] iBFT detected.. > > > [?? 30.308796] > > > ================================================================== > > > [?? 30.308890] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880be453004 by task swapper/0/1 > > > [?? 30.308890] > > > [?? 30.308890] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.11.0-f9593a0 #12 > > > [?? 30.308890] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > > > 0.0.0 02/06/2015 > > > [?? 30.308890] Call Trace: > > > [?? 30.308890]? dump_stack+0xdb/0x120 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890]? print_address_description.constprop.7+0x41/0x60 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890]? kasan_report.cold.10+0x78/0xd1 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890]? __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0xf/0x20 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ibft_init+0x134/0xc33 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_check_initiator_for+0x159/0x159 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ibft_check_initiator_for+0x159/0x159 > > > [?? 30.308890]? do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x3e0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? perf_trace_initcall_level+0x3e0/0x3e0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? unpoison_range+0x14/0x40 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.5+0x8f/0xc0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? kernel_init_freeable+0x420/0x652 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x21/0x50 > > > [?? 30.308890]? kernel_init_freeable+0x596/0x652 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? console_on_rootfs+0x7d/0x7d > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x21/0x50 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? kernel_init+0x16/0x1d0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > > > [?? 30.308890] > > > [?? 30.308890] The buggy address belongs to the page: > > > [?? 30.308890] page:0000000001b7b17c refcount:0 mapcount:0 > > > mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0xbe453 > > > [?? 30.308890] flags: 0xfffffc0000000() > > > [?? 30.308890] raw: 000fffffc0000000 ffffea0002ef9788 ffffea0002f91488 > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [?? 30.308890] raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [?? 30.308890] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected > > > [?? 30.308890] page_owner tracks the page as freed > > > [?? 30.308890] page last allocated via order 0, migratetype Movable, > > > gfp_mask 0x100dca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), pid 204, ts 28121288605 > > > [?? 30.308890]? prep_new_page+0xfb/0x140 > > > [?? 30.308890]? get_page_from_freelist+0x3503/0x5730 > > > [?? 30.308890]? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x650 > > > [?? 30.308890]? alloc_pages_vma+0xe2/0x560 > > > [?? 30.308890]? __handle_mm_fault+0x930/0x26c0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? handle_mm_fault+0x1f9/0x810 > > > [?? 30.308890]? do_user_addr_fault+0x6f7/0xca0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? exc_page_fault+0xaf/0x1a0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 > > > [?? 30.308890] page last free stack trace: > > > [?? 30.308890]? free_pcp_prepare+0x122/0x290 > > > [?? 30.308890]? free_unref_page_list+0xe6/0x490 > > > [?? 30.308890]? release_pages+0x2ed/0x1270 > > > [?? 30.308890]? free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x245/0x2e0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? tlb_flush_mmu+0x11e/0x680 > > > [?? 30.308890]? tlb_finish_mmu+0xa6/0x3e0 > > > [?? 30.308890]? exit_mmap+0x2b3/0x540 > > > [?? 30.308890]? mmput+0x11d/0x450 > > > [?? 30.308890]? do_exit+0xaa6/0x2d40 > > > [?? 30.308890]? do_group_exit+0x128/0x340 > > > [?? 30.308890]? __x64_sys_exit_group+0x43/0x50 > > > [?? 30.308890]? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x50 > > > [?? 30.308890]? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > > > [?? 30.308890] > > > [?? 30.308890] Memory state around the buggy address: > > > [?? 30.308890]? ffff8880be452f00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > > ff ff > > > [?? 30.308890]? ffff8880be452f80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > > ff ff > > > [?? 30.308890] >ffff8880be453000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > > ff ff > > > [?? 30.308890]??????????????????? ^ > > > [?? 30.308890]? ffff8880be453080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > > ff ff > > > [?? 30.308890]? ffff8880be453100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > > ff ff > > > [?? 30.308890] > > > ================================================================== > > > > > > George > > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.