Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp711093pxb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:05:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAJQ/GVqz2ykPmdo6D6+2SbWkXikfGKH8MyAbMxyOKkJF/nhAg1itfjmZKkqdKsvO9TtyZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1155:: with SMTP id g21mr5037633edw.279.1614287154622; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:05:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614287154; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1LNfuAHIVzPbSc/sb17eu4QqmonZ4gfk4HKRCsPBiB8CT2o17jtpevx8XFkVYjsBF8 aBZzFFrx9h8ySQeYyI34SzfSjey8kISygcpH+a6ee2doGqdPsh6sr8lBYTzgcFKm8ETk pr1n810Zq7t+km2p2kPrYGTD+KdU3EMwy4yYkykNF+G0hA8BeASuFEQCdg+w46Q1/tHd Vkid8zMVfcPJ0+Z/SxqMVTDbVZHero7qKVBURCPO7W6yeNEpbejqMbGjdbrhredQO13V h6dIbag33BVIHhDunrcvdCg4kpMqzTs03djZkrduIO7qZOEKMZ7EdPyprihqsB0bSfrY j6ww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:reply-to:sender:dkim-signature; bh=wygaDEDOrN320QX+DWUCOdywurQj1DTKqvUyYvvMFVc=; b=QDMjdoVykr07h61ClGPgI9wGgmr6b7afmR2rqf0dZQ/C/57GcUW5ja6Rp+zYxxX+pj u6Gi6xJfdEP4VnV9DZTZ7fvUeGr3YMjWFqAaswJuKa1ucfwH36W2BsI5Z2ej67NcuiQ7 HwvlTD4RSLhCyTA/UIV/fzsxHIJsx7Y/eDqJxg8WRw42UGvltErqeHli2Ao2hYiFx8vz 3huESkwS9ml2zyUxbkA+3Jj+tyYhKwXWaPoKdL02kPqo3lod3qy7SfmvD3bGREbVs715 tm2Gsnjqsd0ZB+S9R4UY8vMA1mklpqFlMBWRtC81Cd/lWHO8gHeNvkMUsO/lUHzntKRB vzfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="XBC/vyeL"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fs18si3795625ejc.644.2021.02.25.13.05.31; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:05:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="XBC/vyeL"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235138AbhBYVDU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:03:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234708AbhBYUwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:40 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com (mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b4a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EA8C061A32 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com with SMTP id p136so7625229ybc.21 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:49:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:from:to:cc; bh=wygaDEDOrN320QX+DWUCOdywurQj1DTKqvUyYvvMFVc=; b=XBC/vyeLmlxmeTcNjRlbqndRFXV+OZIx4QATdTRaHc1LavPxAbhNt3VVKMB9y3UVST 1tpr+Hi90L0/JFgKAzP4XqkVHr8L3PP8fjUn7CUwzfeiS7KYy+QonEMof+4S0Rc8xPj+ kP7bjvKDGpSZQXG/IUUY+IJzoqcvjUskD/Ye24nnzM9VHLhVVxQ91yd5E5AtcjTHzCdk nKNL5qO+xSHMZyLjXkhhNmc8IlsQ3hFFBYBZIll65QqzbADKcYbHTRnw92DgrqQ88DB6 jO+kb/ADc4XSnonJlCOjR24kcqI/o9XmUcw0bp0z8ZHNHSjnb51y2qS17+zOkNn6RnCr z38A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=wygaDEDOrN320QX+DWUCOdywurQj1DTKqvUyYvvMFVc=; b=Wn8eMVG9RJHWbaegE3NLie4F1nZT+4QcVfwp6hHXXADkJl7eFqjeqzSDaltN+uW/2X AeOksVN3w1n9/dm7+AC4DwmhHR883cqm/+8YwgSF8znfsWlnodgY/dljOQRnf68X8Qxz OIEWUVR6d7xOF0Cmtqzcf0Kq4/JkIf/bs4/wScXlXbJsbCMP0ysmWLU/i6N+OrD2+mib RuaJWcEu12d5jqi6Eu758cTHTLnMeOt56J4OtiEw6goqccnSFgw58Tz1K75Y1WLdsJ3L 1H9tBDhiLaD7oB070f/PukvR1qTD/C8A8WRNGOy7VttooCKIhfn8HekAYekMRruKJuJV IH6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FEK8jBWtcPT18kLcvK9DsX+ffxZaRoDKVC7/4OMu/AKBN8+K2 MerzDb54xWghyqeiKcPE1ZtYCodzi8Q= Sender: "seanjc via sendgmr" X-Received: from seanjc798194.pdx.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:34c4:7c1d:f9ba:4576]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:9108:: with SMTP id v8mr6916513ybl.321.1614286140867; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:49:00 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:47:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20210225204749.1512652-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210225204749.1512652-24-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210225204749.1512652-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog Subject: [PATCH 23/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use low available bits for removed SPTEs From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Use low "available" bits to tag REMOVED SPTEs. Using a high bit is moderately costly as it often causes the compiler to generate a 64-bit immediate. More importantly, this makes it very clear REMOVED_SPTE is a value, not a flag. Cc: Ben Gardon Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 11 ++++++++++- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 11 +++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c index e07aabb23b8a..66d43cec0c31 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c @@ -277,7 +277,16 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_value, u64 mmio_mask, u64 access_mask) SHADOW_NONPRESENT_OR_RSVD_MASK_LEN))) mmio_value = 0; - WARN_ON((mmio_value & mmio_mask) != mmio_value); + /* + * The masked MMIO value must obviously match itself and a removed SPTE + * must not get a false positive. Removed SPTEs and MMIO SPTEs should + * never collide as MMIO must set some RWX bits, and removed SPTEs must + * not set any RWX bits. + */ + if (WARN_ON((mmio_value & mmio_mask) != mmio_value) || + WARN_ON(mmio_value && (REMOVED_SPTE & mmio_mask) == mmio_value)) + mmio_value = 0; + shadow_mmio_value = mmio_value; shadow_mmio_mask = mmio_mask; shadow_mmio_access_mask = access_mask; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index 2fad4ccd3679..b53036d9ddf3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -174,13 +174,16 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask; * non-present intermediate value. Other threads which encounter this value * should not modify the SPTE. * - * This constant works because it is considered non-present on both AMD and - * Intel CPUs and does not create a L1TF vulnerability because the pfn section - * is zeroed out. + * Use a semi-arbitrary value that doesn't set RWX bits, i.e. is not-present on + * bot AMD and Intel CPUs, and doesn't set PFN bits, i.e. doesn't create a L1TF + * vulnerability. Use only low bits to avoid 64-bit immediates. * * Only used by the TDP MMU. */ -#define REMOVED_SPTE (1ull << 59) +#define REMOVED_SPTE 0x5a0ULL + +/* Removed SPTEs must not be misconstrued as shadow present PTEs. */ +static_assert(!(REMOVED_SPTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK)); static inline bool is_removed_spte(u64 spte) { -- 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog