Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp718702pxb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:18:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9Qgg9NrRP+5RET8UXozmdRlQilv06X6a2ja+Gllkc7jsGJUQGt/OLm6lSvH7JsrOk5xGQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:948d:: with SMTP id t13mr3420933ejx.402.1614287907929; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:18:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614287907; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1CrZXDeePO9/2r4YFc6Exx/KR/Vd5nmSUNzLO6yebExXcnIJOgSa6kmDQcJAonTmxv ia/ux1aGCRt/jsr+sbQnou2vBTc5QBSEErxZ2VZ6Bmi8I85jHpI6v4uvdVXoHqKaqXsL aSLQ8FR5TH3tw2UILe8vaxr2BWDqtrlFuoan3efjiwZaUf4zRlxYfFpRzjdzXyBOjYT2 sa0yV+KRlhKWD96rGAzkoRbZuj/EuWCBSggT21B4q+DU/w1uYrRrgKgIWr24vIPFaXIr LDPSUBMQqFgQjCCQ87dYeSsUujwBF1gv3BDzvy+tC6guB5BZVVkiaPPrjKnhe6Nwm0Nc wDzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=HXpU5t4ZCsLP8BkNSkXT52ij4c0xZVCAGleignyH9bg=; b=0ctuOswPRIMpP7yOHtRC+HJrL+P5S5gRrKnYWMNXUviYgVOb9BLwTOh8/tXOjNLhKM /HFOQdMtsf/+SA4tXOQjLHCMYnFuTwLmEVlT+hJXH2dDUqw8UzqWwtZX6ElwZwmTLWeu 5EzoDNRwJzEr8lMm7rynsxD1gva5dazuyNnGZ/3FmUhq6gC2dK52elxE1k/nbt7+gO7s T4xiPKNHwjeqBEhvJIRHPyik5LgUwVFStjd5fJ2ZOQPFeqYZZMuYLJLeoU9pqCKUWs2O 1ivynR2FmzY1rxdsvwctrWm3gZXck2Bdhqu8Z/xfmDoIy6SmPIvUpmeLcaIJnDWGieFf bpDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lwn.net header.s=20201203 header.b=ABQS9PRv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e29si4722884edc.590.2021.02.25.13.18.04; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lwn.net header.s=20201203 header.b=ABQS9PRv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231614AbhBYVQ6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:16:58 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:37892 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229566AbhBYVQz (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:16:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45E198B2; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 45E198B2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1614287773; bh=HXpU5t4ZCsLP8BkNSkXT52ij4c0xZVCAGleignyH9bg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ABQS9PRvrjPCv+E6gZQLBMdV5A2FJVPv3sJNXZa96r/K8dhE4XCb+R0woxkawPqMn ziNBF7D6cDFnYnFqptQuIv7vQq/TnfkIaCkDqKpUCMOzAEqs/GWP85oevPvJagIFHl dT8SyzvvMyaey2bRPLIP5HHCcEoPCZzRdbPj4Q8ZTep2anqHTO7FItElfSQXXFPrqO /6pdiZNKelme2tLDcF38+AAoXMm09JRgGjD2gg59xkiPTeTV5dQ10HWashMAvMKyDj HmGafbew6zeDLFWTWpK3xCMCCoEHfR9uDCULBlOAqjQdZOk53OaagBv61WaKQvuqQE bJVkswBCvH1Vg== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Dwaipayan Ray , Joe Perches Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lukas Bulwahn , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] checkpatch: add verbose mode In-Reply-To: References: <20210222075205.19834-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:16:12 -0700 Message-ID: <87mtvrc0gz.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dwaipayan Ray writes: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:03 PM Joe Perches wrote: >> I don't have any real objection to this patch set, but as this >> might be added to the Documentation tree and in .rst format, >> perhaps Jonathan Corbet and/or Mauro Carvalho Chehab might have >> some opinion. >> >> Also I do not want to be a maintainer of this .rst file and >> likely neither Jon nor Mauro would either. Perhaps you? >> > > I could take it up if everybody is okay with it! > >> Ideally, the patch order would be reversed so the .rst file >> is added first, then checkpatch updated to use it. >> > > Sure, if Jonathan or Mauro has no objections to it, I will be happy > to resend it so that it can be picked up properly. So I haven't been copied on this for a while. Looking in the archives, I see that you have a manual table of contents at the top of the document; you could take that out and let Sphinx generate it (and keep it current!) for you. Either way, though, if you want to merge this via some other path, it's OK by me: Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet Thanks, jon