Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1006649pxb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:22:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1oN02CeuFOyBHAOWNplYmdCkQsbhrgF4+E+Hlu/hrrRSDhAsAZQYjA8HPIeEFnm2Xka6b X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a896:: with SMTP id ha22mr1799699ejb.503.1614324146375; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:22:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614324146; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wNrA6IFJu8G1aqDvQd+0yRW7BVhcztD0es1GG8qMZGFppIKs/cKbfBrKKxzYP22L9w rLiMItPLWsC49XhHZ4dV7l4UyyOR2iIyWctYazGY0Orq2mz9L+w6WD475eKzdjgrhf0r QBkaAIogcQDmGZ3wodTqIujHzb041HlRDInr/fu2y09LGzw376HU+GWBKWbmYmcC7p09 rTlRaNyqwycxQfWRMpPsOrnrfGBV6Voi+Y9fOB7kNcWV9hOA38tX25V4HkauyYCQFKkr WnKO4hZTx85X5FHA56NdLSVMXLangXltAk1DIfCU8p3Ombha92VwvWJKwocejHzELHBT R77A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from; bh=Er37msp1oYW9KFumvZeN3jL53UDEutwOeLFH26SFTLc=; b=h3BmjKB3xWqLwBvXpEqzDkrT+j9OZbSJfRgAtdq4w7PhaotvJ0K4BuOldFmQaaDx4J Xle7z8GTGrIdNPyWxkWw+stqJqUf3XeP/bv5OnV56+cJ0UEr6b/yF2Jd1d5BLPH4tnah /STwcWlfRTqyVmWOe3OLkS5Pe6F0B0u7xBbcW4tllUuAw4B9kA/vOKNW1EMljjRYRqEW bAHcCB7airLFATrmmpsQ+6OwvL73INP7dvpSqsAF03M8+qn8oDGckcxNgy/OTHuvJ+oB ufnOxpPc7Nje7E1d4gaws5zjYesG9XMs/53QF7sJkuCqey4aoiXFOl7GuKLPiooKIvof rrrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=hKjZzO4y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qo25si5230259ejb.288.2021.02.25.23.22.03; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=hKjZzO4y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230128AbhBZHUI (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:20:08 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:14606 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230001AbhBZHTp (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:19:45 -0500 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:19:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (172.20.145.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:19:01 +0000 From: Alistair Popple To: , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , Alistair Popple Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:18:27 +1100 Message-ID: <20210226071832.31547-4-apopple@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210226071832.31547-1-apopple@nvidia.com> References: <20210226071832.31547-1-apopple@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [172.20.145.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1614323942; bh=Er37msp1oYW9KFumvZeN3jL53UDEutwOeLFH26SFTLc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=hKjZzO4ykfe69uf2fhPuJL9Y1nm4cXKyYKKhZRX6MGkI0QuuPVp2JmEcu/nKK26zv zEzrSJummNBZcvDyCDSWGWwXaG36wmn9gql4nfINeuxFrn1bQuCoFvwHi4OMkeSmuU +/+nIKorxiP8K9YD9y4uwPiSGEMxlJFwInFa3iQ2FClj81AgXmXOkt4Za/q6CrsNP8 2cqNYyge6QBAAnmBIVau7kQOXqQ51Ai/OJHa8xpFvweS5Frk9fUX7row4+dYpp+/0A H643VxvLvK8qDHL/ZDxDEdloi7fM59PtLcfp9Wunw5Zqc3Hm0zCjKGw5uz5L1PGRm2 +fbiMs23poupA== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The behaviour of try_to_unmap_one() is difficult to follow because it performs different operations based on a fairly large set of flags used in different combinations. TTU_MUNLOCK is one such flag. However it is exclusively used by try_to_munlock() which specifies no other flags. Therefore rather than overload try_to_unmap_one() with unrelated behaviour split this out into it's own function and remove the flag. Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple --- Given the comments on not needing to hold mmap_lock it was not 100% clear to me if it is safe to check vma->vma_flags & VM_LOCKED and if re-checking under the ptl was significant. I left the extra check in case it was, but it seems one of the checks is redunant as either the first check is racey or the second check is unneccsary. --- include/linux/rmap.h | 1 - mm/rmap.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h index 70085ca1a3fc..7f1ee411bd7b 100644 --- a/include/linux/rmap.h +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ struct anon_vma_chain { =20 enum ttu_flags { TTU_MIGRATION =3D 0x1, /* migration mode */ - TTU_MUNLOCK =3D 0x2, /* munlock mode */ =20 TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD =3D 0x4, /* split huge PMD if any */ TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK =3D 0x8, /* ignore mlock */ diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index ef9ef2694c58..850eecdd866a 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -1391,10 +1391,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, stru= ct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mmu_notifier_range range; enum ttu_flags flags =3D (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg; =20 - /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */ - if ((flags & TTU_MUNLOCK) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) - return true; - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && (flags & TTU_MIGRATION) && is_zone_device_page(page) && !is_device_private_page(page)) return true; @@ -1455,8 +1451,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struc= t vm_area_struct *vma, page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); break; } - if (flags & TTU_MUNLOCK) - continue; } =20 /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */ @@ -1775,6 +1769,44 @@ static int page_not_mapped(struct page *page) return !page_mapped(page); }; =20 +static bool try_to_munlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *v= ma, + unsigned long address, void *arg) +{ + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw =3D { + .page =3D page, + .vma =3D vma, + .address =3D address, + }; + bool ret =3D true; + + /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */ + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) + return true; + + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { + /* + * If the page is mlock()d, we cannot swap it out. + * If it's recently referenced (perhaps page_referenced + * skipped over this mm) then we should reactivate it. + */ + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) { + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */ + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) { + /* + * Holding pte lock, we do *not* need + * mmap_lock here + */ + mlock_vma_page(page); + } + ret =3D false; + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); + break; + } + } + + return ret; +} + /** * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page * @page: the page to be munlocked @@ -1787,8 +1819,7 @@ static int page_not_mapped(struct page *page) void try_to_munlock(struct page *page) { struct rmap_walk_control rwc =3D { - .rmap_one =3D try_to_unmap_one, - .arg =3D (void *)TTU_MUNLOCK, + .rmap_one =3D try_to_munlock_one, .done =3D page_not_mapped, .anon_lock =3D page_lock_anon_vma_read, =20 --=20 2.20.1