Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1105953pxb; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqhXdRDbMFUDxdXgQ/rw8msJwjmak3mSwaVVoe0vBdv5lkQsysd/NZXEjJcHRo4GH+qJf0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:544b:: with SMTP id d11mr2650132ejp.167.1614336117689; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614336117; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=brAU8raX8YFTKtUwamjkaBzG2HYD/3FYXhHH7RYA+Po+7q15j1wlL6aHFZbIGTjdKG pZPKRIVAX1JkI34stQaE4HtCKwGnFR8wheXV/r7Xt1r79HZkECU+yt3RJcfO3ey5PkQE geLSqbxlnInvGpDSs4lOEfRFUOzFyUiYD72HyHeiEy9pwQglbIJsysNGqckRxq6U0bj5 dgCpSAmqHYN2N4z40KGzlHRixnNSXeaotdDimTbZsVB5XU+tI6gtY/J7DYFuq/Wt4Dh4 ZCoNDXIml5vmWO63OTIvRY9woW+SgwhSvdyfPRDqnateacxYbvyh08lCx/GhXKeTkWfP wq6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=XLI6Z6TwA9BTqCwhODbEfBdDxUU/ebBYzuPVyBL3+xs=; b=KckXQxNuJWFvA/vK21D013y2i/00hbY2fhr4gTarxZ2KxsX38sqG/ENX80lii15Yra oNe+AVmcE9g6HtY+F7UwTHi6G/aR4jxft0aiQ5NdfrmewIKwaX856y8HhLEzr+hhpgm4 WWSBUj+KtMbzBx/4nCuZ/V9XbVV+qT7k0obIVctPtKm/0I9Y9vc2g/5+zFxXC2gpSG2C 0j7GHJOPnlP+l+NmgqF1PVhN0XY7B8BNgfnA99gUn/jGSzj7hn0FeUhb6PoCjG731pGo V+upMTubrwSOLd+sEU0WiysiEAOuCP/iFDPAsAeNTysjTwYQOyYi3z+cVjkaNA8fYyUc W9Fg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=QEzn1ldt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b19si5493595edd.84.2021.02.26.02.41.34; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=QEzn1ldt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231150AbhBZKjb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 05:39:31 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50144 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230495AbhBZKin (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 05:38:43 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9D264F03; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:38:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1614335881; bh=H8HVbdFoLD9aL64l9aoJCNHX5FsjhZMjzGatuz4+oiY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=QEzn1ldtP7wH67ppM8NvuV87amu0rHg0D1u+B6QZ4lIV9oBTg9NOC69He8bmIrbgS Ta8J7QUW0GfXDGsMZ7ciWvECtNClh5Dg2jBjYL/6Yh4pZ0zn+U/jcpcIxgoR1Xn0lk 4f0vn/+0UnOn0RwvPZQwdYRCUOgPDOcFbmEIT6YFeRKJl8RvpQcfQcY8mRoZiCvf9N AeNzuoZM+b5gSAbI9XGj6n0ieGaiCQ27ZgyqmKRtWaA7T6B1Ffj/dUqokb1f5i3gA2 /UyJWwzH1+MLZ2fcJ5BNgEeI0jQNiJckpREvUIWdVlSJ9+wDXyYpUwr80mMyt//9Ez YHPc7A9WJ3VYg== Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id i21so6989252oii.2; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:38:01 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Scdj2hnrMWz+Uo3CMkSO9pSg17VwA4c6AIwAh9M2NJNmlOdR3 zuu6rIUdVnS/52dPhAcm1lpTuL9cFte1bWnpw/c= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4a47:: with SMTP id x68mr1476692oia.67.1614335880815; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:38:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210225225147.29920-1-fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com> <20210225225147.29920-5-fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <20210225225147.29920-5-fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:37:44 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] misc: Add driver for DAB IP found on Renesas R-Car devices To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux-Renesas , DTML , Linux ARM , Linux API , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Chris Paterson , Prabhakar Mahadev Lad , Phil Edworthy , Dirk Behme , Peter Erben , Linux Media Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:51 PM Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > The DAB hardware accelerator found on R-Car E3 and R-Car M3-N devices is > a hardware accelerator for software DAB demodulators. > It consists of one FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) module and one decoder > module, compatible with DAB specification (ETSI EN 300 401 and > ETSI TS 102 563). > The decoder module can perform FIC decoding and MSC decoding processing > from de-puncture to final decoded result. > > This patch adds a device driver to support the FFT module only. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 ++ > drivers/misc/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/misc/rcar_dab/Kconfig | 11 ++ > drivers/misc/rcar_dab/Makefile | 8 ++ > drivers/misc/rcar_dab/rcar_dev.c | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/misc/rcar_dab/rcar_dev.h | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/misc/rcar_dab/rcar_fft.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/rcar_dab.h | 35 ++++++ Can you explain why this is not in drivers/media/? I don't think we want a custom ioctl interface for a device that implements a generic specification. My first feeling would be that this should not have a user-level API but instead get called by the DAB radio driver. What is the intended usage model here? I assume the idea is to use it in an application that receives audio or metadata from DAB. What driver do you use for that? > +static long rcar_dab_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > + unsigned long arg) > +{ > + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg; > + struct rcar_dab *dab; > + int ret; > + > + dab = container_of(file->private_data, struct rcar_dab, misc); > + > + switch (cmd) { > + case RCAR_DAB_IOC_FFT: > + if (!access_ok(argp, sizeof(struct rcar_dab_fft_req))) > + return -EFAULT; > + ret = rcar_dab_fft(dab, argp); > + break; > + default: > + ret = -ENOTTY; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static const struct file_operations rcar_dab_fops = { > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .unlocked_ioctl = rcar_dab_unlocked_ioctl, > +}; There should be a '.compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl' entry, provided that the arguments are compatible between 32-bit and 64-bit user space. > + > +static int rcar_dab_fft_init(struct rcar_dab *dab, struct rcar_dab_fft_req *fft) > +{ > + u32 mode; > + > + for (mode = 0; mode < ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_dab_fft_size_lut); mode++) > + if (rcar_dab_fft_size_lut[mode] == fft->points) > + break; > + if (mode == ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_dab_fft_size_lut)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (fft->ofdm_number == 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + rcar_dab_write(dab, RCAR_DAB_FFTSSR, mode); > + rcar_dab_write(dab, RCAR_DAB_FFTNUMOFDMR, fft->ofdm_number); > + rcar_dab_write(dab, RCAR_DAB_FFTINADDR, (u32)dab->fft.dma_input_buf); > + rcar_dab_write(dab, RCAR_DAB_FFTOUTADDR, (u32)dab->fft.dma_output_buf); Maybe use lower_32_bits() instead of the (u32) cast. For clarity, you may also want to specifically ask for a 32-bit DMA mask in the probe function, with a comment that describes what the hardware limitation is. > + > + if (copy_from_user(dab->fft.input_buffer, fft_req->input_address, > + buffer_size)) { > + mutex_unlock(&dab->fft.lock); > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + > + dab->fft.done = false; > + ret = rcar_dab_fft_init(dab, fft_req); > + if (ret) { > + mutex_unlock(&dab->fft.lock); > + return ret; > + } > + > + rcar_dab_fft_enable(dab); > + wait_event_interruptible_timeout(dab->fft.wait, dab->fft.done, HZ); > + if (!dab->fft.done) { > + rcar_dab_fft_disable(dab); > + ret = -EFAULT; -EFAULT doesn't look like the right error for timeout or signal handling. Better check the return code from wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead. > + > +struct rcar_dab_fft_req { > + int points; /* > + * The number of points to use. > + * Legal values are 256, 512, 1024, and > + * 2048. > + */ > + unsigned char ofdm_number; /* > + * Orthogonal Frequency Division > + * Multiplexing (OFDM). > + * Minimum value is 1, maximum value is > + * 255. > + */ > + void __user *input_address; /* > + * User space address for the input > + * buffer. > + */ > + void __user *output_address; /* > + * User space address for the output > + * buffer. > + */ > +}; Please read Documentation/driver-api/ioctl.rst and make this a portable data structure. Arnd