Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1248106pxb; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:23:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwM697QcUJWG9KcYhWjFU0zR3Uz3tjDR9jywMj29reWiC9Flvbscg0ZQFscaiIp2OcEtRC7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7c43:: with SMTP id g3mr3607141ejp.210.1614349422842; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:23:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614349422; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zXRBVwN12/yh8sEvP1f43WGfZKUGhw2sof/A+mXOVRfPKZwquGtf36NnuSXe/HZtJv 7aXUV03mZvpc+95x4rA7lhJqBdmjIX3r7tylbX8xzcHGon5m5692HUtTX7Xv2qkE8Dsy crTkNrWITGvh9AneFQI8QQ35VqwA+Z2gzClcGe05xmrdmqIRDrb0Pcqek4RrHOlmDHl5 O5tdHQ1OwLxPWSiTfoSP5Ittfkw/F3F5PJdH4s+cDIqAEyZdNKHckqdCaZF6N0FZN89T R1Hnju4LFmCDz7betC/kzgr/Dr9g07eVkfOMPrR8Qry+dhs2ln6JiPDnYy2vXB5mPkdw pK3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=fg24dKMXsylujCf9pV0ZPia44btO5GQG0RuB65YXV5I=; b=LmQ+h2ade3isnUXu8rHlUoCZCKUMAuzAuRZ/WWGPLSsUhTJbUcy3Dq9J7lx5anEC4+ 7ltFXW2vQK9rMVfgExG6XvYkEmlvdn3ulLJGwwjm03QXJlfDEn05p1XE7dLNmMG6rZKj WJCyOUc1eMLPne2coXT845EQkmo9YfRFvxdifIz6puOqlXD6ZtBLL5s0xW+wJcwzexXx u8Ifwz52ZJwN6yImCgNUvcf9t/3xnOX+AB904XXE5SQLKZYIu3ffgSdPsKhJCEG7R7ko o+hlSkP+HUpWtD4nXUTb1KeRKSMB1t+R7Y8tVN/yClbh/u2cEH6+hpNegzbscYEoDZ3K 7GyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gEQFvaZ8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l13si6781992edj.219.2021.02.26.06.23.18; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gEQFvaZ8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229751AbhBZOWp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:22:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:44103 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229946AbhBZOWn (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:22:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614349277; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fg24dKMXsylujCf9pV0ZPia44btO5GQG0RuB65YXV5I=; b=gEQFvaZ8IaWkwZlsHwbrTZwisHvgrrrrrxa/8f+fF5fpyUN/FtPWMunspMxVCZXpkmzGse Cx4gBwPejPH1wDn8rN0JpHCYDboiVE63mm4CVDUewK58gQMoq5HKlMPz7NA8FItFFNR882 p+GTZzjtCRoD+kTnigd2muuryoC/88w= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-228-TuFBjM0mPkespy0E26Rhow-1; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:21:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TuFBjM0mPkespy0E26Rhow-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l23so4588479edt.23 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:21:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fg24dKMXsylujCf9pV0ZPia44btO5GQG0RuB65YXV5I=; b=hwUS6g7YOOA5Zvlnf4+fVGnwnFirExkDBvlXNCeQssjFofk8MxYbd9REabIvAsEYMs 0UMsyem4JnHx4S9k8eKMlNmcLUlIrNC9+iZL+HnS/Bj2NXkkJxMFin+Z1Q5w+NjExeqq 6MizwhXKYSjSqQEWkliL8BLOpUBSYvq8xs8uZqw95HrPEnDj38vdbugyPqQyVPkueCNE tn92TEAqY82DDmGWSX7uclFYMG1IqSRVvHK/NcTcyAhE93RsIxXZFiY05ANS3aaosADw 6j53fyVoKaGUbCAmdZqv+CiRurSWKyIQbsAaRAVuwUxrisRXowPXXZR1uqbEtGYBE6D/ wjbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AixsLDqTAYitp8ayO82Tuv7Ru88l1GrkOTjA0Qiss+eJGgpjR nLkffFwzAv28BLiO1mnBUJ5bhMTkMgbqIdtHDHnqS3aZblYufY8OYbkLj3LX9JS8/KfRx4ELpUY aQdBUAkgJ0+s6giB2t6Y2IHV3 X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd84:: with SMTP id o4mr3589774edt.382.1614349273760; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:21:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd84:: with SMTP id o4mr3589755edt.382.1614349273599; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hr3sm5204595ejc.41.2021.02.26.06.21.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:21:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 12/47] KVM: x86: avoid incorrect writes to host MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL To: Thomas Lamprecht , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Sasha Levin References: <20210104155705.740576914@linuxfoundation.org> <20210104155706.339275609@linuxfoundation.org> <85e3f488-4ec5-2ad3-26a6-097d532824e1@proxmox.com> <4fa31425-3c13-0a4f-167b-6566c6302334@redhat.com> <34df16e4-06a1-3343-2fd9-5004ec5f5fa1@redhat.com> <89a2c659-54d6-59ae-826e-c742efdb784b@proxmox.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:21:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <89a2c659-54d6-59ae-826e-c742efdb784b@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/02/21 15:18, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >>> Does that mean I should not take the patch here in this email and that >>> you will submit it after some timeperiod, or that I should take this >>> patch as-is? >> The patch that Thomas requested (commit 841c2be09fe) does not apply cleanly, so I'll take care of sending the backport. >> > Note that the patch I added inline in my initial mail here was already > adapted to apply cleanly, at least on stable-5.4.y > > May not have made that clear enough, so mentioning it here - ignore me this > message if that was read and thought of. No, I just didn't notice at all that you had taken care of backporting the patch. My brain processed it as the quote of the broken patch you were replying to... I wear glasses after all. Paolo