Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1355205pxb; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:43:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+Yxkf66kookewj6PVzeI24z8xgXvrFRi81+E+cVoN64ktxiWALx66WE/6HyINdCgj+oi8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17d6:: with SMTP id s22mr4339711edy.232.1614357787489; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:43:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614357787; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cqlEj8p3f8m+K2uDLqKZfU9wlcsz37/qWN99W9VxMD+bjLLTQwWvFyQCtGwkdCHdti yuan6ooCwrmCnqz5bgBBk9Jxt0O4pnB8NcUGCjSdsFnfJUxUnurrNKvOXRNLvbM3NtWv +cxbtxQ8ObZgIHWtnDQfaiX/j3w+qiqW0WVF327XV0IkYdCcChu7SRgE6GZJAa5D9JGI /GllU4VW9wxvAYzx5vEqY5QIrapixQzTtjXXWnOjOmTB+OkxdPFkuVyVnBUPqJtrc3AM VGvQS3cyBsRHKMH6vP9MgHUsIAb+xzatF9vrwn2KsXgc3fYw+J91cQ+THx807qs0jamw ZEIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=o+3X4BLuP5e42GOpScJQqAr//WbdMHgL/Zpk/eGJKqA=; b=wa0ANqyhUP5qwAhqpWs9CPnNqTEQHYjtpHm5C+AvQ/Yf2ca442vM4bSZGFdgbKRKcf UK7fHoS5LyNSgbqzv4VmaZwCkITj/A+mBnuh7T7AcnskWtOfwVPWU52qpagWmUipIyf7 dwsRGJKDJN073/agFOXLt4qxY05PIFE770tI/iXn1/Tqt2T29kBC+ZSf8WhTVGydQrN4 I68GsT+8WSPlKBijIUnHBJWdATVSP3XnUSvOM0cqarAFrrh5VEabsDDA6rlEdfvzJqsa X4iqmYGkEu+hYSQSrINY+7kFu5utgzLxtEnDdy9dj8fMrTcbGZAKft7vogOCEsFvbkJD LS1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=ynektlSv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kd27si6132251ejc.632.2021.02.26.08.42.43; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=ynektlSv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230144AbhBZQll (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:41:41 -0500 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:40826 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229769AbhBZQlj (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:41:39 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046661.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11QGR2fZ025164; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:52 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=o+3X4BLuP5e42GOpScJQqAr//WbdMHgL/Zpk/eGJKqA=; b=ynektlSvURU73KKGUMj/mpyXAaO0ThH4BZC0kKl1+WOcgoUYaNJ42V+1uVjAHX6yOf7L WOZhDeUDi2PCWG4CVzTeNQze+Rb/IuIL6LQyDXhowIYCjGVgfyhTauPdZ8laxvZEmtsf BFGmK3t/cIDat9P5TZ+vKU5HbIQo3XcUBdlFEIr6SXchGNhM51wn80srGoO2u2A7Qs+z kpAY04eOdQHp7zDlofSDAQjQs+YT8OG3ZnKx4V2o1uqyTcSCRrswyCeIJxW34fU/8LOM 0Euaq3nLx2dFlLIYCOtQMWY7G5KSLB8O/5xe+csl9kbZ5DBM8hIjQhaoqa13urv6zAZ2 Ag== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36w66vxuud-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:52 +0100 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 694B5100038; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag2node3.st.com [10.75.127.6]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5693B24163A; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmecxl0889.lme.st.com (10.75.127.48) by SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:50 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a remote processor To: Mathieu Poirier , , , CC: , , , , References: <20210223233515.3468677-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> From: Arnaud POULIQUEN Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:40:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210223233515.3468677-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.48] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG2NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.4) To SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-26_05:2021-02-26,2021-02-26 signatures=0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mathieu, On 2/24/21 12:34 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Following the work done here [1], this set provides support for the > remoteproc core to release resources associated with a remote processor > without having to switch it off. That way a platform driver can be removed > or the application processor power cycled while the remote processor is > still operating. > > Modifications for this revision are detailed in the changelog of each patch > but the main difference is that going from RPROC_RUNNING -> RPROC_DETACHED > is no longer supported to avoid dealing tricky resource table issues. This seems reasonable to me. If necessary, this could be part of a separate series. From test point of view, it is working pretty well on my side. Thanks, Arnaud > > Applies cleanly on rproc-next (e8b4e9a21af7). I will rebase on 5.12-rc1 when it > comes out next week. > > Thanks, > Mathieu > > Arnaud POULIQUEN (1): > remoteproc: stm32: Move memory parsing to rproc_ops > > Mathieu Poirier (15): > remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() > remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() > remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state > remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state > remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() to rproc_ops > remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops > remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation > remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() > remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() > remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table when attached > remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached > remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached > remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached > remoteproc: Properly deal with a detach request when attached > remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 21 +- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 263 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 + > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 17 +- > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 168 +++++++-------- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 21 +- > 6 files changed, 362 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) >