Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1828191pxb; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:19:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1+WFC1/MiCDvvB1m4XoWhHUXSmzC/tV0it4ciHhHozXr+hThnsw3FxyJwR2YAKan8+Rw1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3556:: with SMTP id s22mr7377434eja.85.1614417580295; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:19:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614417580; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H3GjWm7z7KffAmwkNW/Eu1vj8dR7ga7uuX9sCJS2zMbxJHctlqd0Cn8GckQPXQEkEz PUM19g0oLkAregojoQd8+yoUTQjX/dVrjQHzfoydprJcwlqZulqvg6XrxoBt3nIi/+RP 9ln6BugjJT1x8vcxLv/5nYew4f9Jk4Lu2PylqhRh2O6riu4k+rEXjv1u2ktuKfM8PC/w dVLgeOiIocTCnxuJV1VmMx4AgsI0z0vTPKkkoFzZvFxRAmsQ9zDirUDuoUAD3eTCXUGF CVICRLPzdpElZY/VBxsPF5jX/fNMNDuxVs5ysI77g7keurVt6a6bNqmgLaho209dakg9 J5Gw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=rFn3WZXquuWhJU4qu+ClIPvji0Vi9A60lu/mbJJHGK0=; b=dAbqRmRiWIwfqwg6O2+LtJ7FkbXT6G5IzKcXHXv5h0B7gdEX51Q5ZcmP0SrEIkBA1S EB6v+siL0eewk0+4Pb1yh4Yv5H8lHkNYSdBx231fYNUvflcqi0BBSOY7jkfuPE9M8xKn JzfKDvga+XepmCMoIc1qEM3zmTNc/hr5c9h4s2JMEyu+GnVHmyELRyD+jMQ5kKs0+wFF qlc3hIg1zwKJXT8YqDfIG+1YeG6MvMzMDJivs9JUxcCW3I1jahBMe3zXedk28xhV+PWJ vkl9dCzV7PvgKUmTCc1oKp91eYN0PGgm0zC6fnqOIBRrNt5Wk86w/aOcxZPQVfkPKuXv FKHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PpqZWET3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w3si36714ejc.311.2021.02.27.01.19.16; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PpqZWET3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229864AbhB0JPl (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 04:15:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230014AbhB0JPj (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 04:15:39 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E766EC06174A; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:14:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y12so485127ljj.12; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:14:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rFn3WZXquuWhJU4qu+ClIPvji0Vi9A60lu/mbJJHGK0=; b=PpqZWET30mB6ohRaAsLn8uBfFQFKXMjj/+gAF8bJmLlOt5L6QEf8EE3zJIRqpo1rHW 4pvjVFar0d7IZY6Aox8gdLYsuBG5twI6RQnEecBLmzcMcN3OzvopA5kGdBIF9DPST+C+ o+m821BNmiOyUZswIkQsiX5vLctqgqRe1+Up0T46jjW/2J+MgQXo7U4H+uaKsgjWo8Nj xsDwD+1jkTRqXAiRomSufeqBE9uHHDYEGmtiZ2aJ362Iu2ReXcSxM3q5MlAYuZuqs43l 6rPVKQw2KgohXOGfZJdNHpFHTw2cDNtr70DuOcFE9rgXdthjJgNBdRJev5W33/uhcYEg r5vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rFn3WZXquuWhJU4qu+ClIPvji0Vi9A60lu/mbJJHGK0=; b=HG//b4U4g9tWdObP/Y+gWOFHKKnrxfcItCBNavqUTqBn41w/jzx2yzcRO6tglrtmjm rKgYmZCF1E6qOU3P2GhThC1Oh8hruDrlsNRcp3VBW4quV+Yyp2/wrK0JHGkurHUMYswU xrQDiblFOhEebJKfdmQMspTVQWIAYdlHvzPh9OwPngKDPPmu5r2SdW6fRfTKY1OtO5pn Rh0+CUINdkjz7IqftbdnlDWun8MS1JSeGiBkwqCLOd8sWYgSUA99GgUDoxNjCTXtPGbI 9CIUY8lzshUUDdlGzNsCWLubLxZz3c+V5eM4I/4QYQ1MjAgu7j04Ie9tcB6LwJ+arJOG E0Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+J74/limwoDVbC6d2hlOlvg+g+aFq0eSvzGT/C+RKQT5xnyuA 7jnnuJ5ZXLeuQ1j75fUaKIv3rCDIWWo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9143:: with SMTP id q3mr1090486ljg.283.1614417297367; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([178.176.75.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h27sm1674574lfp.120.2021.02.27.01.14.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 01:14:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] list: Add list_is_null() to check if a list_head has been initialized To: Laurent Pinchart , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sakari Ailus , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart References: <20210226224938.18166-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: Brain-dead Software Message-ID: <5272a97f-b221-82f0-f1ee-10eccd05fc09@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:14:55 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210226224938.18166-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On 27.02.2021 1:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > From: Laurent Pinchart > > The new function checks if the list_head prev and next pointers are > NULL, in order to see if a list_head that has been zeroed when allocated > has been initialized with INIT_LIST_HEAD() or added to a list. So zeroed or initialized/added? :-) > This can be used in cleanup functions that want to support being safely > called when an object has not been initialized, to return immediately. > In most cases other fields of the object can be checked for this > purpose, but in some cases a list_head field is the only option. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > include/linux/list.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h > index 85c92555e31f..e4fc6954de3b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/list.h > +++ b/include/linux/list.h > @@ -29,6 +29,19 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD(struct list_head *list) > list->prev = list; > } > > +/** > + * list_is_null - check if a list_head has been initialized > + * @list: the list > + * > + * Check if the list_head prev and next pointers are NULL. This is useful to > + * see if a list_head that has been zeroed when allocated has been initialized > + * with INIT_LIST_HEAD() or added to a list. So zeroed or initialized/added? :-) > + */ > +static inline bool list_is_null(struct list_head *list) > +{ > + return list->prev == NULL && list->next == NULL; Maybe instead: return !list->prev && !list->next; [...] MBR, Sergei