Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161138AbWI1ONT (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:13:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161140AbWI1ONS (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:13:18 -0400 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:18886 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161138AbWI1ONS (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:13:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:13:27 +0200 From: DervishD To: Gene Heskett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Creative Commons as an example of a simple license Message-ID: <20060928141327.GC32708@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Gene Heskett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200609280807.21329.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200609280807.21329.gene.heskett@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1913 Lines: 40 Hi Gene :) * Gene Heskett dixit: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 02:59, Esteban Barahona wrote: > >apparently I "have lines longer than 80 characters" so I have to post > > like this: http://www.zensui.org/CC/about_GPLv3.html > > [...] However, I wasn't aware that the Creative Commons License was > a "pick-a-rule" license, where you could drasticly change the > effect of the license and still call it the CCL. It's not exactly a "pick-a-rule" license. I'll try to explain (but my explanation can be an utter nonsense, so read the licenses yourself anyway). Just like GPL is "copyleft" and not a "copyright" because you *grant* rights instead of taking them up, the CC licenses may be seen as "some rights reserved" instead of "all rights reserved". That is, you give something but reserver some rights, for example, the right of attribution. If you reserve that right, derived works have to carry your name in addition to the person who modified your work. Or for example, you can give your work for free and require that it is not used for commercial uses. You're reserving the commercialization right for you. It's a very interesting license because it's like releasing your work to public domain, but restricting what you may thing is misuse of your work. I don't find any CC license appropriate for my software, but I think it is a very interesting license for art, books, etc. In fact, I find it much better than, for example, GFDL for books, manuals and other documentation. Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/