Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:50:07 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, vbabka@suse.cz, guro@fb.com,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: use PF_ONLY_HEAD for PG_active and
 PG_unevictable
Message-ID: <20210301115007.mgw5vthgjoibnjf4@box>
References: <20210224084807.2179942-1-yuzhao@google.com>
 <20210226091718.2927291-1-yuzhao@google.com>
 <20210226091718.2927291-4-yuzhao@google.com>
 <20210226121314.GB2723601@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210226121314.GB2723601@casper.infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:13:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:17:18AM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > All places but one test, set or clear PG_active and PG_unevictable on
> > small or head pages. Use compound_head() explicitly for that singleton
> > so the rest can rid of redundant compound_head().
> 
> How do you know it's only one place?  I really wish you'd work with me
> on folios.  They make the compiler prove that it's not a tail page.

+1 to this.

The problem with compound_head() is systemic and ad-hoc solution to few
page flags will only complicate the picture.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov