Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030326AbWI1Rot (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:44:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030327AbWI1Rot (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:44:49 -0400 Received: from xdsl-664.zgora.dialog.net.pl ([81.168.226.152]:54533 "EHLO tuxland.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030326AbWI1Ros (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:44:48 -0400 From: Mariusz Kozlowski Organization: tuxland To: Michael Obster Subject: Re: OT: linux-kernel list and greylisting Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:46:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <451BFF6F.2050602@obster.org> In-Reply-To: <451BFF6F.2050602@obster.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609281946.11845.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 955 Lines: 25 Hi, > anyone here who has experience with greylisting and the linux-kernel > list? I want to configure greylisting on my server but I don't know if > this setting is compatible with the list here. > What I want to avoid is a massive bounce because of that! So please give > me feedback, if greylisting is a problem for the list. Greylisting relayed traffic is useless. Greyslisting is also expensive (delays and bounces) so probably that's not what you want. Anyway if you know what you are doing ;-) take a look at this: http://aisk.tuxland.pl/os-fp-vs-spam-src.html OS based greylisting is a compromise. Gives great results with minimal costs to most of incoming traffic. Regards, Mariusz Kozlowski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/