Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 18:21:42 +0100 (CET)
From:   Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
        Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
        Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>,
        linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1037673059.602534.1614619302914@mail1.libero.it>
In-Reply-To: <20210301113805.jylhc373sip7zmed@pengutronix.de>
References: <20210228103856.4089-1-dariobin@libero.it>
 <20210228103856.4089-6-dariobin@libero.it>
 <20210301113805.jylhc373sip7zmed@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects
 number
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marc,

> Il 01/03/2021 12:38 Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> ha scritto:
> 
>  
> On 28.02.2021 11:38:54, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -730,7 +728,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
> >  		idx--;
> >  		pend &= ~(1 << idx);
> > -		obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> > +		obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
> >  		c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
> >  		can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
> >  		bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
> > @@ -740,7 +738,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	/* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
> >  	atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
> >  
> > -	if (clr & (1 << (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)))
> > +	if (clr & (1 << (priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)))
> 
> Do we need 1UL here, too?

Do you agree if I use the BIT macro ?

Thanks and regards
Dario

> 
> Marc
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |