Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp885333pxb; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:42:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSh6dlWFhVoIMIuCZezWz9A15fsucOiEZRcF/8cDgbugnNjko8bfmmvlP+HOKPGjm4C1Zn X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:520b:: with SMTP id s11mr2256421edd.212.1614829372154; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:42:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614829372; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y9ja8u+IZ6M9D/Qh8vsCWVpX7G9z1snz6oOGKt+K7TNNFJSXtz38JKAdQjkUTP3CmT GNCQvlwJzGncqhQpkN8BuPkkXgU5fv5fAe2LVUM8+EvBRDYffSz0SgEhQLb2/z+ODG5Q grExKzPPNWBQ1p0EqkpkyVE/mZOOYH3zpUuF4sf3uHhrUWyRul1ohxx93mKddMQepqNY Uy+lxGwXsGwGDXJAsCjy1ibTtyx1eGKzfPPmNOz9HKRxfjFXbuvAOErKYkBWsFr6yYwW ufACkb5cgiDN0fw4kK20IGS6fza1cwNwK4BswUooCqxzOP7t7WLKwbGlKOxO3YdBsF+K Ps0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=DjkDlkVPV5AuD5Lr9WjgZz811yZ0iC30e3am03IU+6s=; b=KCXTZzUAS6a3+CQG10yZ7bbZMObv2vFbAOs/sZNs8d28DauGjjhj9HrsIqv577dkz5 PDwNAYAgGGx16nliJdM+b5Bd1OQxC6dflAe5Hi8ivCjA8tunqNZ4HXWzlEWqCGvYaVPl 8XD9hwPJHyyWIOUEeAXdklYt2hsXkGidK+kW08XHAo0pDyvXETykg39eHuSm9s/WGODU 1Jwjqyjmd6izlha1LDvEHZVfeJVNKN4xOvbeybNB6nU6RAuGkLn+0MjAWTIpnB8rveg6 hKI+vt05g/hbjR9WdMhb9tZvbQ4rBBqfkABo5VqNXFLDf4hU+KB+f7VAsC/fm0nEqNdn uwew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=z7I1RDz0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a13si9334138ejx.335.2021.03.03.19.42.30; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=z7I1RDz0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379711AbhCBBam (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:30:42 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43910 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241305AbhCATS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:18:57 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C13C6502D; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1614618864; bh=VN2LbeV/k1u+KdN4BD9jvO/bu9VE5JQM0K8KvunqV7I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=z7I1RDz00ovmaX1zf47DypbHiKgEBkxWxV1W7UU8TcmvsMPI/XyeWjuZpPKtAL4Em JJn3GALyFTnlCM4NqnlE4Gyz5Su59ietePYy3v/aLBVBadASXQhog3VJH5a9bz/Wis QCaJ5Z03QtGxHiAjJQy5Tj547q/sInVSrbuCN3Os= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Harald Freudenberger , Vasily Gorbik , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 228/663] s390/zcrypt: return EIO when msg retry limit reached Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:07:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20210301161153.084985218@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210301161141.760350206@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210301161141.760350206@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Harald Freudenberger [ Upstream commit d39fae45c97c67b1b4da04773f2bb5a2f29088c4 ] When a msg is retried because the lower ap layer returns -EAGAIN there is a retry limit (currently 10). When this limit is reached the last return code from the lower layer is returned, causing the userspace to get -1 on the ioctl with errno EAGAIN. This EAGAIN is misleading here. After 10 retry attempts the userspace should receive a clear failure indication like EINVAL or EIO or ENODEV. However, the reason why these retries all fail is unclear. On an invalid message EINVAL would be returned by the lower layer, and if devices go away or are not available an ENODEV is seen. So this patch now reworks the retry loops to return EIO to userspace when the retry limit is reached. Fixes: 91ffc519c199 ("s390/zcrypt: introduce msg tracking in zcrypt functions") Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c index f60f9fb252142..3b9eda311c273 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c @@ -1438,6 +1438,8 @@ static int icarsamodexpo_ioctl(struct ap_perms *perms, unsigned long arg) if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) { ZCRYPT_DBF(DBF_DEBUG, "ioctl ICARSAMODEXPO rc=%d\n", rc); return rc; @@ -1481,6 +1483,8 @@ static int icarsacrt_ioctl(struct ap_perms *perms, unsigned long arg) if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) { ZCRYPT_DBF(DBF_DEBUG, "ioctl ICARSACRT rc=%d\n", rc); return rc; @@ -1524,6 +1528,8 @@ static int zsecsendcprb_ioctl(struct ap_perms *perms, unsigned long arg) if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) ZCRYPT_DBF(DBF_DEBUG, "ioctl ZSENDCPRB rc=%d status=0x%x\n", rc, xcRB.status); @@ -1568,6 +1574,8 @@ static int zsendep11cprb_ioctl(struct ap_perms *perms, unsigned long arg) if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) ZCRYPT_DBF(DBF_DEBUG, "ioctl ZSENDEP11CPRB rc=%d\n", rc); if (copy_to_user(uxcrb, &xcrb, sizeof(xcrb))) @@ -1744,6 +1752,8 @@ static long trans_modexpo32(struct ap_perms *perms, struct file *filp, if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) return rc; return put_user(mex64.outputdatalength, @@ -1795,6 +1805,8 @@ static long trans_modexpo_crt32(struct ap_perms *perms, struct file *filp, if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; if (rc) return rc; return put_user(crt64.outputdatalength, @@ -1865,6 +1877,8 @@ static long trans_xcRB32(struct ap_perms *perms, struct file *filp, if (rc == -EAGAIN) tr.again_counter++; } while (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter < TRACK_AGAIN_MAX); + if (rc == -EAGAIN && tr.again_counter >= TRACK_AGAIN_MAX) + rc = -EIO; xcRB32.reply_control_blk_length = xcRB64.reply_control_blk_length; xcRB32.reply_data_length = xcRB64.reply_data_length; xcRB32.status = xcRB64.status; -- 2.27.0