Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/340] 5.4.102-rc1 review
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux@roeck-us.net>, <shuah@kernel.org>, <patches@kernelci.org>,
        <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>, <pavel@denx.de>,
        <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <zou_wei@huawei.com>,
        Yanjin <yanjin.yan@huawei.com>
References: <20210301161048.294656001@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <8271eb39-c44d-37ed-7501-e9d05d7fee17@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:42:15 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210301161048.294656001@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On 2021/3/2 0:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.102 release.
> There are 340 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:09:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Our test CI monitored the 5.4.102-rc2, and compile failure:

kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘IRQ_WORK_BUSY’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   IRQ_WORK_BUSY
kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: invalid initializer

Should be commit e1e41aa31ed1 (rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late
deferred wake up before user resume) fails the build.

By the way, do you expect us test the 5.4.102-rc1 or the
5.4.102-rc2 in your tree?

Thanks
Hanjun