Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp956713pxb; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:28:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLpbOv2j/ylaxYir0VP24OpsVgukKAmvYIpGXZER91TGJJg07L/ME8bE9BxAvNJ2nKLX7h X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d0cb:: with SMTP id u11mr2634446edo.163.1614839285118; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 22:28:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614839285; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O8zsrZfIJMFCQyQPcW6d3C9A+GPYqB4hY1p+OUCEfGt8Q16mxPDpFL+H4yMn410Rk+ DYRSiF5DRp5RHe+4sEc0kujMIZVAaLzyyOcfCiEXUnk67S21aNzBXFv9pH5VrGE+RZ6y /7vALMK1bXJjKWuTk2LPpnIYk3xlIZfS46MRFh84+I/y7yYxLlQ/lqnERDCzCwVQRx8f m17ff8kNrORzfQN1yG81IED/qsqn+iXk+cAWl7w5lKTNUTKp9FHkHHsE7qhW5pQbEGPV Xjp/fHH4UnD2cdy92x63Vdp85aSk9PPChdJeF7TfnW7VGhCKOFa75DHu1oD8Zjzt89Ol lcgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=QJOWkHTP1MeIhKYg+kgpI2YjnJNnpoUFabPb1mIWuH4=; b=YugjEMcQ9eVXzgtokWMcJV+s/CR1r0dPFNYNDmhVB31WohrvytbfTttxT+RQhJqC/B EKy/1t6gFQrZuYzarKXYo9mgyZMdtsmW7E+o4oDXfcfG78Qdv8sK6RcqxZKt+q1Tpltb OUP7/pYX1c/SFTRMhCrhYdHSy7oP0tdZIth0rcZ/Q8jTyRxNA/SgC04wRH+vqe02+aeY nA0oh6irm5E2R0oUK5tL2v287n0nqCmrwe2YWGk6ddgClYVTX/TLlu+Br7Ki1+IM0rfe NDMJEiKE3lGPAhrd9ho5VN2doKokRN/GKYmZWMCsDBnIKDgamOGuT79yk6lirL42tkat 2UbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h8si17188014ejj.71.2021.03.03.22.27.42; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 22:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1839425AbhCBQRx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:17:53 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:13110 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351233AbhCBNuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:50:16 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DqcXT29wSz16FHX; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:54:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.147] (10.174.178.147) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:56:04 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/340] 5.4.102-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Yanjin References: <20210301161048.294656001@linuxfoundation.org> <8271eb39-c44d-37ed-7501-e9d05d7fee17@huawei.com> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:56:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/3/2 20:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:42:15PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 2021/3/2 0:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.102 release. >>> There are 340 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:09:49 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> Our test CI monitored the 5.4.102-rc2, and compile failure: >> >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: implicit declaration of function >> ‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘IRQ_WORK_BUSY’? >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func); >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> IRQ_WORK_BUSY >> kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: invalid initializer >> >> Should be commit e1e41aa31ed1 (rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late >> deferred wake up before user resume) fails the build. > Ah, thank you, I'll go fix that up. Looks like 5.10.y also fails with > that issue... It is, same compile error for 5.10. I just confirmed both arm64 and x86 have the same compile error. Thanks Hanjun