Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp978276pxb; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:16:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4r7TT95JCrOq/NQdKvabpaLq5jJRfJS1oxB9qNOIw4a3FMpUdMcHJlIgNxz8qnVzLl546 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d1a:: with SMTP id dg26mr2794006edb.266.1614842187465; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:16:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614842187; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=heRO2A8iQSdU6veoFCkViZMEE5NuhAbfSSoGNC8Qgz7Ni1ffELidpvDWL21J4/WXtj 5Tyiex+RkEjFLr1hElmlseCAN5mjPH6nbAWF1wlu54rTQOYzmsug1lYc2ii7zrAIxCr6 mbzx7abjpZRr0sqosbGbI9mt5nROC8jWnM3ST8TVKC1y/qlBy4qw5KvRsNhh+bDS0H9x d0w2943wtqyskDNPcrwg4hV98DSRXJinjsjku4OZZajts4zrhafyLtxW02rcps6tydb/ l052Kl4tGhDzp7qrnKWqr/IphLwvhHA/e65wqRivv7YCnR4vSFkFQZEIkmUfWUN6abB+ gr1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=LoXsMIh8kxioX7DB8CWUSz1tO5CDutkuFkB3ayoWzcQ=; b=FZ5O5lOEcjXGk/Ra7yiGjX6kFWSp9+PQPYmRWPHOi+JCNDFNykjkPoVuuTSSc/9dti t8TZ0h4SI5UAqn1ytx/pYGfQPYno5N1QbtaeyrCKUjHgYsITbWg/hYmfKUZuYx7FT6Wh NK8YvsazbZAcJNcGPb3EGQZI7W2ZAeuE8laq0cilw28Mcl/kcgCd1QuUSEchy1xiWb28 Yp8l8TNrCQN+qv0k5XChTWx9rFkeslGbvx+RRQjg3MAvuayv8Gftosy6buwc0Tt9ClP0 EMu+WfJlya2uXhkBhzpcHW2/DZ4Ldoj/q8vGoaJ13ce0/2LV53Nz+75h2o2rijz8wWqz 3dLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=F5zdcuhq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si17298691edp.562.2021.03.03.23.16.05; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=F5zdcuhq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2360155AbhCBWRP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:17:15 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:48032 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232227AbhCBUdX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:33:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614717104; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LoXsMIh8kxioX7DB8CWUSz1tO5CDutkuFkB3ayoWzcQ=; b=F5zdcuhqn5Vj+h+B3vNQdtWH/JAhLPKjPhfBUm9qwutYZQRIjIvMU/ojPdwmsJ6Yv3uwpm A0pesZMtnXOjEXv5zALVQrLCWuVfyWtNGXkWfdZX0WeyZEKDukAExBZTkYKfx5sm99y0LZ t+eeY41psqBMX4IZt8R6KWmADPy+rFc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-165-OE0YojrQPy2CBngDxBhEcA-1; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 15:31:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OE0YojrQPy2CBngDxBhEcA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA72518B9ECA; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.192.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C973A60BFA; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 21:31:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 21:31:34 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Anil S Keshavamurthy , "David S. Miller" , X86 ML , Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep? Message-ID: <20210302203134.GC21871@redhat.com> References: <20210301165130.GA5351@redhat.com> <20210302112224.6b3568434be490fbfbdec790@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210302112224.6b3568434be490fbfbdec790@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Not sure I understand you correctly, I know almost nothing about low-level > > x86 magic. > > x86 has normal interrupt and NMI. When an NMI occurs the CPU masks NMI > (the mask itself is hidden status) and IRET releases the mask. The problem > is that if an INT3 is hit in the NMI handler and does a single-stepping, > it has to use IRET for atomically setting TF and return. Ah, thanks a lot, Oleg.