Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALCETrXzXv-V3A3SpN_Pdj_PNG8Gw0AVsZD7+VO-q_xCAu2T2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210301165130.GA5351@redhat.com> <CALCETrU2Rc4ejSoYyWgbk00U8tSc=aZDaj0mm+Ep62wOirZG7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU2Rc4ejSoYyWgbk00U8tSc=aZDaj0mm+Ep62wOirZG7g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:24:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+czV6u4CM-A+o5U+WhApkocunZXiCMJBB_Zbs0mvNSwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Is there something like a uprobe test suite?  How maintained /
> actively used is uprobe?

uprobe+bpf is heavily used in production.
selftests/bpf has only one test for it though.

Why are you asking?