Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp989740pxb; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:42:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMtFZbAAj9lbA0RHrxYmE8b1cip9K3fCKx9MZ3JcFVz21oZr5QArmUAUbWeFwf+J157iFj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:34c4:: with SMTP id w4mr2983954edc.367.1614843765606; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:42:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614843765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ChWDthIaMiLDFynAGmX4wZ66/+hXhM7XXw7pwSwn8mBNg1JGGDz57RommK+i3+8EQY EqMmUM1KJfOh65s26ITB2QQQ4KLCX2gyCrL28Drt/cmW1khRUUnzMEMdbSQ1mQslQy1s iPgn3BtnzNvqTQE/HTzltpYbGbFDGnSEi3N61sFp6OIKcvW3VC74j5aBszhj3U1hi+2j WN6SYcRhioGrlfvKIb1fVRRkdyDuzGc1fyZet1sFtLN44p+TASAdey3qvL3WMPiM7j/h gPTvffEgyIpFORtP4YmkPh1Mw6ctsLaXHXlQQd0Gu2ooHJPpHb7wgD0btFFGjvAILdez Glnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=cIU5ealcIOeIc3F4pCSZNuodBditt73WLIYB0nOtfLA=; b=ijiprb+VrLlzDXlNzo7s7KiEHmHFw4ySlhd3Lz3bSb2WyfUnQuQIbmmwOTzvp82vUk FZjgN7jHzsyXQeQXRo3iee+WfFTExWEmDBgMuMaFq4W+HDFArFjSnNsO4xFCklMt/rQc zH9BDHd6iCF6C1cftxnjqiqirxe+hsF8jij1O/6Py3mI5MU/7ZD9vvsKtCEbCYVqfvzw wOGHznNZXT7GKrv0SVTI43oKabG+dMTaSgJDLj+Ltr1Reu6uv/un9070oKki5YXWZZtm DkeQpt9Ua9ESHpWBdiosHL7C/4bEan76G5U5m7LgpXjG54uMsd0C6oM3RBM9f1mHxzni sqcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gentoo.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eb8si17594888edb.535.2021.03.03.23.42.23; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:42:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gentoo.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357437AbhCCKtt (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 05:49:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234035AbhCBX4L (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:56:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC4DC061797; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:42:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 23:39:25 +0000 From: Sergei Trofimovich To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Dmitry V . Levin" , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT) sign Message-ID: <20210302233925.081075e0@sf> In-Reply-To: <20210221002554.333076-2-slyfox@gentoo.org> References: <20210221002554.333076-1-slyfox@gentoo.org> <20210221002554.333076-2-slyfox@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 00:25:54 +0000 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that > `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly. > > The bug is in mismatch between get/set errors: > > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return regs->r10 == -1 ? regs->r8:0; > } > > static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return regs->r8; > } > > static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs, > int error, long val) > { > if (error) { > /* error < 0, but ia64 uses > 0 return value */ > regs->r8 = -error; > regs->r10 = -1; > } else { > regs->r8 = val; > regs->r10 = 0; > } > } > > Tested on v5.10 on rx3600 machine (ia64 9040 CPU). > > CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > CC: Andrew Morton > Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich > --- > arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > index 6c6f16e409a8..0d23c0049301 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct *task, > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - return regs->r10 == -1 ? regs->r8:0; > + return regs->r10 == -1 ? -regs->r8:0; > } > > static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task, > -- > 2.30.1 > Andrew, would it be fine to pass it through misc tree? Or should it go through Oleg as it's mostly about ptrace? -- Sergei