Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1107104pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:33:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbgPBGHzXN8vETiRyfj1yAY9eYLSQjEAWzkfCbNBTwlt8jdfXFDuxOuysh/uvFRvRdak+E X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1bf2:: with SMTP id t18mr3767430ejg.418.1614857606528; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 03:33:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614857606; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S5joyrDS/S6+iP/Qnuil0v2ZUlgqTXShwgi4uC0ScDXFL5LEG1CkNOlJAhLb6qsNzC JwtzaLv+B9NtaptT6uNQXy6LvHd27C9oapFS+Jwb/6WkKTqSdQn0awq/8O4rIWNCABSg 5N8K/RuSqqQAy1uZR+wxOPSe/nzJ0Dt3Z0U+Q+h49J+m4T6c077uXZSFUesEpPhmSinW olQrn3eSFld3g1x0JFmPi9Y3iOKmxkd2uwGgvP1iNEzJeOs17kD5HAn5v8Ek2feMQbJd Az5M2kA6zlAiRZSsd2vVAat55fw0MP2W0pGPGTr2kxJ9KM420uU39xqTeT/S/le5kMnl VMGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=JivoEYpyGZ7Jk/xla6Wb62SSDfaFd+x+8QhTD9UxzGo=; b=s+QoCw9r8PD3yJtnQZdt9w/pC+Q/uqLWJd7a51/jsj1f1umT3ZbFh2ABtg2LpipjEX +BwFeA9Z4xLtLmXjeWshKmgpEtSRRMudI0UK+aVthxI96WHBTTSFm8L0Fs+ZZ4rHmysO 4O+mBmRtn9kl1X7MDUjDx+uYIMZSGDront3hgFMQXSFawWCMaUZ6vVBWNFhOEfGQb0IU 0gNGh/lTXvg2Qf52RspVcsarDXiOcrQrHhA/E8+FgGlksJdbiIkmdKzD+pKet+tgS5JH s0MGgsSxaKbld/vtpnTlEpf/Lf5ai4a6VKvHzTUfhmyp/uDvYq69i2LvjwlztOtQ8oxI 7VcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="bnU/BRK1"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lc7si10281644ejb.426.2021.03.04.03.33.04; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 03:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="bnU/BRK1"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1835497AbhCCSDp (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:03:45 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60964 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1382128AbhCCPWM (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:22:12 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC4D964EE6; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:09:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1614784149; bh=kuSlFyqS0esHp6a9WfeHEtn7CGyzwnqKO7imFdyzNGg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bnU/BRK1bn9yIFBSrdz+SxcaRejYSiommzyqQjTxS/gEUJb2zQwJSnEB6/8NPVSN1 ZLYI4M2yFVY00TTjTdg8aw4E5VuiM7QRhCmmxn43RSl4VJTNDKuX6Pzwyuw599D/yy 4evYEdxZ8RoNOXYnjOEP2+q42CGNfu6l8l/YdUhs= Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:09:06 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , taehyun cho , balbi@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: make USB_DWC3_EXYNOS independent Message-ID: References: <20210303022628.6540-1-taehyun.cho@samsung.com> <20210303103839.it7grj3vtrdmngbd@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:56:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 3/3/21 6:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > [ ... ] > >> Anyway, that's the convention or consensus so far for entire SoC. If we > >> want to change it - sure, but let's make it for everyone, not for just > >> this one USB driver. > > > > Great, let's change it for everyone, I don't see a need for ARCH_* > > symbols except for people who want to make it simpler for their one > > board type. And for that, use a defconfig. > > > > I don't think that will work in practice. Many ARCH_ symbols for various > architectures contradict with each other. Almost all watchdog drivers > only _build_ for specific platforms/architectures. Great, that's horrible to hear, so much for a "generic arm64 kernel binary" which I _thought_ was the goal. ugh, you would have thought we would have learned our lesson with arm32... greg k-h