Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:44:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:43:53 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:2177 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:41:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:40:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011106.154059.126759204.davem@redhat.com> To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: iptables and tcpdump From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20011031172835.4f0c0ed2.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20011030152812.2e9ba8ee.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20011029.213157.39157336.davem@redhat.com> <20011031172835.4f0c0ed2.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:28:35 +1100 On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:31:57 -0800 (PST) "David S. Miller" wrote: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:28:12 +1100 > > should the NAT layer be doing skb_unshare() before altering the packet? > > I think it should. Agreed. The 2.2 masq code didn't do this, and hence the "don't tcpdump on masq host" recommendation. Please try this patch (compiles at least), Applied to my sources... Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/