Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1168078pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:14:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSTtpEeK6k7LdX5gjHgJ9tDloaeS19WpatDTbgH/zqM9RLAI/+klr10t9R3mskrcL/5nYr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8474:: with SMTP id hx20mr4170428ejc.129.1614863665838; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:14:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614863665; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vq5ZTCwEh5Fwk9rVhaxIJibOAPsX1inUD8oPn2uEQKQ107MQll7AQVZ/Prfn8KiwFt AdFl/I8NkhY1/Q361GWp06Qmp4YpDdNo94BK2+smJez3xep/Bg3AaL1v7R8HyUBmSNaM Ivq/Q4PbkPgU8XZJ6QLoKmzrxIX8fQhewo7gHBTrMq874RkvSxJ9cittU87q8q6UCQdC Pp3TWINheP2fkM1wiTkg5AnMxXgDxkpjakaDQYDjqemFFcOGEXXxOQppBYvVNQppuJ+K yff7w1sY8NfXyCajoN1ypJ619kvrSknwKYDJQCupa0TQ9HdAmQ+siXRLMxlUOsmQnXjm c0Ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=SHQc0b8Bvq3uujPEsc97MH5fhYkb6hDGWrW/IjbBm+0=; b=eIyEqJoLhIUX9TFUFPX9k1T6HUcjBiC4h30fNg4TqCrA+Ugb1MRxKdE5Ip82nXwIot 0fEPSKbC0wF2oyETvb2qnIC+fFmD+gwcRElPV/df4IBfk3T0H/pYRNqTpx/lhuXp3Bsw PBTL6hbGmdtKtbmYTg+/64RReVSL5aFSS1mzxnDvB5s6hlm2pTV39fgwN2QvHZoWrajf SlNH0B1Tddv5r1ZTpqS//tU5VE18gxpDQNLUTHl68zlek5DLlYsXxip5oH+KIpMQQRHY oYHc6rqSi6/g/byE6W689s2/go+ZJ0gtZqAp+XnHewKcpDWIRRqfTU/FgrAQJRSHvrir bLdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a2si10143307edy.86.2021.03.04.05.14.02; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243337AbhCDAH1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:07:27 -0500 Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org ([194.107.17.57]:38524 "EHLO vmicros1.altlinux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1388454AbhCCVpY (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:45:24 -0500 Received: from mua.local.altlinux.org (mua.local.altlinux.org [192.168.1.14]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBEB72C8B9; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:44:09 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mua.local.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 508) id 119137CC8A2; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:44:08 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:44:08 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: Andrew Morton Cc: Sergei Trofimovich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT) sign Message-ID: <20210303214408.GB19445@altlinux.org> References: <20210221002554.333076-1-slyfox@gentoo.org> <20210221002554.333076-2-slyfox@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210221002554.333076-2-slyfox@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:25:54AM +0000, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > In https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 Dmitry noticed that > `ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO)` does not return error sign properly. > > The bug is in mismatch between get/set errors: > > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return regs->r10 == -1 ? regs->r8:0; > } > > static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return regs->r8; > } > > static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs, > int error, long val) > { > if (error) { > /* error < 0, but ia64 uses > 0 return value */ > regs->r8 = -error; > regs->r10 = -1; > } else { > regs->r8 = val; > regs->r10 = 0; > } > } > > Tested on v5.10 on rx3600 machine (ia64 9040 CPU). > > CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > CC: Andrew Morton > Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich > --- > arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > index 6c6f16e409a8..0d23c0049301 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/syscall.h > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct *task, > static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - return regs->r10 == -1 ? regs->r8:0; > + return regs->r10 == -1 ? -regs->r8:0; > } > > static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task, Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin -- ldv