Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1206285pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjtE5Dla823b88md54wv3r6CCRdroOPqFgPdWNpraou3HZOipyFeV0YApzjfjUdhtPVXuh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1545:: with SMTP id p5mr4456705edx.155.1614866987171; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614866987; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ed5GU9atIGKIpWCCM8YsGH6ajC0EKLKjD273MONhxmOh8i9cU+WyhhI8az/6MF6aOe 6X+Huxf7B4sKTuXd06YywjJDeufACxME5Wksfz+F4Js+PoMy2qeKKJObox6i0cFVicCE ZOXqeAaoYMgDx9HqVJLGsj//6/oYfU9Dh079CgwgyBW76EZUlq1oVZ9OYI3i9Bptgqvj nMDeogSA99oZL73vPnn7gyCYnXedqdae/doUk54CXYn8PTKduf95StlmDBhTABBM6WA2 QoABrThiY8zXT+Bm75N2AQMfQbxa6mopunIehv2ZHBGbrqjjfoqd62EzfLj4TdemBMLK w6LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=6Ra/15/jPeoKrSdFIUtPdW00QuDBe+AZOJOFsAB7Uog=; b=EgiYAzmV0WRzYVjOdxs/rDtQN4osQtZ27s4cRvluQ17TarNaBcRGR90nt0g0e6Kcme pIyrerwinfeHVf4O64q6WIIEjfeRs+8pUvb6p7/DnUjdC3ulFwKGlkOWopMJNqgWye2U 4e8YAApVNU7qvBWGuVe71Sq1L35sLtzsAJuBcpUB/TI34pglXyWQxKcFjdXvXNPx9doG WtQNw6/qWgPIrZHc6CO9nj3a5XolILDLLnBzrx9omDqUIea9SE2KPi8eF6+COfU3UYKB TToxJyNxnEJjUvKU1YpdQJbt0JJgkUZfE1pBngfqd1mCD5Aw2ajdLO14fbifw7r+ZmrF TEDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=oOxS63Mv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m19si15406802eds.451.2021.03.04.06.09.12; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 06:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=oOxS63Mv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238701AbhCDBCl (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:02:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60136 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346274AbhCDARF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:17:05 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4CC864F23; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:37:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1614814676; bh=QCCQHrxj18Ela26CMOkkAHtcJIjeecbSIqJn3aghvGg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oOxS63Mv3+Ue7LtrTZDn0Hkpt2HXFchTv0kaM+nSyyyqQUBfBACIPtegIG3xMeI3x 63XSKFLcCTqAsbL5LBiDga/iUBy9KLkSbCqfXT2y5vcrWlUmal5AXbmIoYhtorjKgR fOQqq5/scBG+oBexGS9XRh0xeXvA/sSysahsm1mNWo3E3dT/5FX/vHuEdbeJ32gGD3 cFc960EgqGEbt13uOUh8Th6IkJl0m/YToHrZIfaDwMAjtwSEgOAtGwWKwRkgIgXDJB FpfW5HPDbbCiXVl8MTsdk3EGMDdVP9mX7Jxbr/Y2QDnLzpWehlmj1ZO1h6ot3xXINj RZkxDu45j+N6A== Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:37:51 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kbuild: remove LLVM=1 test from HAS_LTO_CLANG Message-ID: <20210303233751.k5tkmjdt627oucn3@archlinux-ax161> References: <20210303183333.46543-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210303183333.46543-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:33:30AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > This guarding is wrong. As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst notes, LLVM=1 > switches the default of tools, but you can still override CC, LD, etc. > individually. > > BTW, LLVM is not 1/0 flag. If LLVM is not passed in, it is empty. > > Non-zero return code is all treated as failure anyway. > > So, $(success,test $(LLVM) -eq 1) and $(success,test "$(LLVM)" = 1) > works equivalently in the sense that both are expanded to 'n' if LLVM > is not given. The difference is that the former internally fails due > to syntax error. > > $ test ${LLVM} -eq 1 > bash: test: -eq: unary operator expected > $ echo $? > 2 > > $ test "${LLVM}" -eq 1 > bash: test: : integer expression expected > $ echo $? > 2 > > $ test "${LLVM}" = 1 > echo $? > 1 > > $ test -n "${LLVM}" > $ echo $? > 1 > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Yes, there is not too much point of checking if $(LLVM) is set or not because we already check for the other tools. Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor > --- > > arch/Kconfig | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 2bb30673d8e6..2af10ebe5ed0 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ config HAS_LTO_CLANG > def_bool y > # Clang >= 11: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/510 > depends on CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION >= 110000 && LD_IS_LLD > - depends on $(success,test $(LLVM) -eq 1) > depends on $(success,test $(LLVM_IAS) -eq 1) > depends on $(success,$(NM) --help | head -n 1 | grep -qi llvm) > depends on $(success,$(AR) --help | head -n 1 | grep -qi llvm) > -- > 2.27.0 >