Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:14:01 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 209/247] staging/mt7621-dma:
 mtk-hsdma.c->hsdma-mt7621.c
Message-ID: <YECWyczIicq5Hl0X@kroah.com>
References: <20210301161031.684018251@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20210301161041.907312533@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CALCv0x36mPwPwFpB8P6nc4kfu_PB=U81RoY9=q31Osx4sGtC3g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCv0x36mPwPwFpB8P6nc4kfu_PB=U81RoY9=q31Osx4sGtC3g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:41:39AM -0800, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more clear in my original email, but we
> don't strictly need this in 4.19 as the check only became fatal in
> 5.10 (actually, before 5.10, but 5.10 is the first stable release with
> it). Feel free to take or omit this from 4.19.

I'll leave it in as having duplicate module names is not good no matter
what kernel tree it is in.

thanks for the review!

greg k-h