Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1428992pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzt4Ony743j50J1d3dMpHqH+kZuKQAPJFnx9dyHXX18eamdSUjf92AP+hJc16MbJ9ejNz9q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2612:: with SMTP id h18mr5792424ejc.309.1614884517140; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614884517; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nifloVqRBX3ztnAj7M7GrX+5cFUemLmuxATVrsbZdpgqsM1pgCag+cfiCQiafCVth/ 5terqw41gLrhMF8mZRFj4VuboY9FiLHSTo86fq8vZjsfw9bQFQM4GF6Mu0VNULqSQ1lG 99pRHLK5yZKi4OCC6Y6C5Lt7hMVsZSJEH6gEp9PzeEw+rQQXaShbPlLEFQ1aVbnEExrR 2g88jmZzDOCj9jp2Lwi1htazElumoyA7z1n9LWaf97V/BguMjK16JzzYt0tEJeGtK56b IZkeiW5jPdeLyyzJdHIYaUUM+oarnBVRyYyzlwKp9DplprFLNE6tfc0ynmFb9YJQm5fn oedA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=tD6ZuOE/37Q5sI2lFAJpJYxzjmw5NqiNJf8WroZej7Y=; b=TtuyWJpNznRin5dpP/dNYmBtcnVRVvo2evuQyqZ3OxWrR/0JJ48Gekd4o2aFKK4TY6 +VRbbxNIpkhJovXhWvBJauPKr+AImMjbF6nbrvH+EIIgKWDgLIXJmQFed+zAheFtN2pm WxQc41bJGaG/KzUV/JJoqoMMOi+YQXiCM9aYO5ZnqwR4E0UsSoudQpLQXMB12dp/R7E8 qJdO6fyBzopZldZGZmdNqAerNHyycEUHjFTHUAZu9wQoaxI2YiB+6zICs3x97adE+GCC jiGzQMOj9B5/N0oj/wF8mxumM5dBApe2GfwKhIzf9DozzHIz79W/iW/WKbkR4CWrTVHJ frhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="tWW1+Z/K"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z18si2027ejx.409.2021.03.04.11.01.33; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="tWW1+Z/K"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231458AbhCDRvI (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:51:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50290 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229599AbhCDRu4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:50:56 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 898FD64F1E; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:50:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1614880215; bh=qHMFp+DR771VBs3rk6GDPx6UFsJ6juz5aNB02nBIg5M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tWW1+Z/KIX+3MI8iP02qNrvcNPOP8NZZu6SFDBH5Oe5ul1JU69bncfHdVHmB8SH4O MShGIqkC2EwvMTd/CryERy/ce5qJ4jn2mL3Esr01pHiEGNjkhXyBYAWYwGqQhQidzU v2psMJz8u3uicyhfiDxZz86OWUEuIolZB/Jndi3VLw+hfqwqpsxhP2E8X/TAc6Y8+j 8GCvp3EYQJX0Qd4/1TP+XCwC8yHqm1KeFMA+cv2iZx38EI5pYu1Gf9sKFK8ute/TjU +QF6MdNnF319iQwWpcWTvrIZh5WnJT3BDZAQO42tg+ec2q7MlERjvo71SygLbKHFW1 +fswrQPMCF/BA== Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:50:14 -0800 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: expose # of overprivision segments Message-ID: References: <20210302054233.3886681-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <920469a9-45d3-68e3-1f8d-a436bdd60cfe@huawei.com> <05b43d3e-d735-ae34-5a4f-3d81a4fc8a9b@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05b43d3e-d735-ae34-5a4f-3d81a4fc8a9b@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/3/3 2:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 03/02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > On 03/02, Chao Yu wrote: > > > > On 2021/3/2 13:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > > This is useful when checking conditions during checkpoint=disable in Android. > > > > > > > > This sysfs entry is readonly, how about putting this at > > > > /sys/fs/f2fs//stat/? > > > > > > Urg.. "stat" is a bit confused. I'll take a look a better ones. > > Oh, I mean put it into "stat" directory, not "stat" entry, something like this: > > /sys/fs/f2fs//stat/ovp_segments I meant that too. Why is it like stat, since it's a geomerty? > > > > > Taking a look at other entries using in Android, I feel that this one can't be > > in stat or whatever other location, since I worry about the consistency with > > similar dirty/free segments. It seems it's not easy to clean up the existing > > ones anymore. > > Well, actually, the entry number are still increasing continuously, the result is > that it becomes more and more slower and harder for me to find target entry name > from that directory. > > IMO, once new readonly entry was added to "" directory, there is no chance > to reloacate it due to interface compatibility. So I think this is the only > chance to put it to the appropriate place at this time. I know, but this will diverge those info into different places. I don't have big concern when finding a specific entry with this tho, how about making symlinks to create a dir structure for your easy access? Or, using a script would be alternative way. > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > > > > > --- > > > > > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > > > > index e38a7f6921dd..254b6fa17406 100644 > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > > > > > @@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ static ssize_t free_segments_show(struct f2fs_attr *a, > > > > > (unsigned long long)(free_segments(sbi))); > > > > > } > > > > > +static ssize_t ovp_segments_show(struct f2fs_attr *a, > > > > > + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", > > > > > + (unsigned long long)(overprovision_segments(sbi))); > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > static ssize_t lifetime_write_kbytes_show(struct f2fs_attr *a, > > > > > struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, char *buf) > > > > > { > > > > > @@ -629,6 +636,7 @@ F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, node_io_flag, node_io_flag); > > > > > F2FS_RW_ATTR(CPRC_INFO, ckpt_req_control, ckpt_thread_ioprio, ckpt_thread_ioprio); > > > > > F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(dirty_segments); > > > > > F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(free_segments); > > > > > +F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(ovp_segments); > > > > > > > > Missed to add document entry in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs? > > > > > > Yeah, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(lifetime_write_kbytes); > > > > > F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(features); > > > > > F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(current_reserved_blocks); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > > . > >