Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1630807pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:59:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwai8WGu7Lu6lTjk87yUkAmyvTQFHN22PaOqwg7MVrVidwqPqOIxQyFM0iOYdOIG1H6TuCu X-Received: by 2002:a02:6989:: with SMTP id e131mr7071976jac.105.1614905941246; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:59:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614905941; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a4bpg4PrHeUghdhf7rScTwuJiIK55h4o90I8bbMD8Ru/xoBzRU/V52NNTz1WqR5SaP 7PJAKH7i3kDXyFRFHp0wXy4x+qKaDGBeLXRHomfHB5ePBzI94VSug47a20BY+sWpyxgu /wbe8L8S2Rj9n/eZEDZteW7UKS8X+ezi9n0qb1CP3PrzipaNWTV7qd8e3lH2T8dquKrH dDwhcjXPBNsha0bluR3D+0Ngp82AJuHMnSYxdXVYIs+aXIL+jgJmpQKX9vBYHeXy9Q4n Zi0G+7YlnMfZr/W3XpabjyHBQrgRGk7FYCrvXPmiE4cMyVpa0n0XTqiQEFKJCAwPz9/d vg5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=F2+VnMvEvSXZzNuMQTq1YMznMBaWnu0FKr4Suh2och8=; b=fWf8vds7ey9OyQglVglNAdr4CYR1Sz2xpqOQ5yzvMBiJHXGhYrknAM1JlbAoVQ23UM OjV2WlaHue1IsdghRwP4rFBKh+7XnkE0nGt6vV/ueOs5nw7zLWjgJm192vwr4lDm3QkE D1YNWdmdyAETJpgu1d14boVgKgjxOKCskNK0El3luUuu4jARd2N8phkveV2tAG8HpDr2 JL300QskiTD2ymCpbhPYBVy4nDHXk3QuohAWzNSSaHr+ajBloNmy4kwKxwVAtdv/YAq+ TJHl2UJSyfLv0F+NYqdWv9zjTywo4YvHTeTTgcjdvvNeg6gHHc0dHfz3SgZj6tpk12vH KfrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=npDHvh0d; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z8si730709ilu.30.2021.03.04.16.58.48; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:59:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=npDHvh0d; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239001AbhCDVKu (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:10:50 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:52476 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239044AbhCDVKp (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:10:45 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1614892204; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F2+VnMvEvSXZzNuMQTq1YMznMBaWnu0FKr4Suh2och8=; b=npDHvh0dps504ou84ECUWWR+K3afvndhhOK6XeXZQ8lVBynxTy2LTNUdhGpWZTh4GucY8P w17Nt84W9NILn3dphMgedxlwpSIN8HQKdQuJbUqk6dZJiseHUdhqizcuxRG+v0RO2u3wnP 6zggCi+Dp7qXH1wjMI2Uh50Xuh4vrXCX6k5VAA+fvksZ72hMQKBOno0bA3Hv0NNxwpCzc9 xTk670P6e94WVgkGRUgts2gFErqTH77tuSLC7Fk6zo+X8HvHXx4HQ6hNfRSI82y6KVyrcp /d4QLN7yp3VxdYuX72+Usptt/FxQ2ezJEJELhVdRnNv/Xu7Px1lsxG4mEbpQtg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1614892204; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F2+VnMvEvSXZzNuMQTq1YMznMBaWnu0FKr4Suh2och8=; b=YD6hZ297R1S7yLhrtJdkZrJ+RFIkqMfasXpRk8AeeaHjCd0g3Fsuw6tmZh5UCA+EWsW10V dO9RNJqohGu6sABg== To: Oleg Nesterov , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Allow RT tasks to cache one sigqueue struct In-Reply-To: <20210303153732.GC28955@redhat.com> References: <20210303142025.wbbt2nnr6dtgwjfi@linutronix.de> <20210303153732.GC28955@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 22:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87im6662xg.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 03 2021 at 16:37, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 03/03, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> >> +static struct sigqueue *sigqueue_from_cache(struct task_struct *t) >> +{ >> + struct sigqueue *q = t->sigqueue_cache; >> + >> + if (q && cmpxchg(&t->sigqueue_cache, q, NULL) == q) >> + return q; >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +static bool sigqueue_add_cache(struct task_struct *t, struct sigqueue *q) >> +{ >> + if (!t->sigqueue_cache && cmpxchg(&t->sigqueue_cache, NULL, q) == NULL) >> + return true; >> + return false; >> +} > > Do we really need cmpxchg? It seems they are always called with > spinlock held. With which spinlock held? __send_signal() <- sighand::siglock held __sigqueue_alloc() alloc_posix_timer() sigqueue_alloc() <- No lock held __sigqueue_alloc() and on the free side we have a bunch of callers which do not hold sighand::siglock either. So the cmpxchg() is required. Thanks, tglx