Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1633517pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuDIwfgEtxg744snoaG8XfroMX0db+NLfwLPen6AKFsuFB7iYIIii9/Ge97LxqfgaGI7EN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:16c7:: with SMTP id 7mr6087543ilx.202.1614906198189; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614906198; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z8ORfvndRYnbWQIFRDfl3zRfFeV5wPglFrULGFvwqVYVA2YZy/A2mMHztR6eLwtdl5 UvxJW9rWEWQN3ABU9buUnIRtGkYh8cgM1QnUXsnvR+RjQIq2tePRaXI5akoQV/ncDnw8 gOMw9wbMVHtuIU5r/GHVr0M25IzC5+xLvH5NqAt1jFpx2fybitLE7ohIEW3QNRVARPlH pK6Q8UaIXuYbPFfRwo0N5hvBGnaH3oMGjgRHogrWahpncJxZeP7IVw5XlAiAmi4y13R3 HYifPARU01YW/5rvDrXk8UrXEzeruwX+gfNUekPGv/CTAupcgFiKdefL2j+wqZb4I4ef j8Ug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fBM3x2Jvh9yrxQ8ou6SaTNUrWPPxI8MhXrn4+8d/y8c=; b=HKzacELpmdVYXJ+FBo+8LzGcAZ2UBp0kJjQbF1QTWkosHa23iN+tCiYaxvzbWC+TUj mWDIi2JehBLfOXeI9X8H3OctH3OkUzib+lkbo9qrnL++yskyh3EJ5hzq922x8hXan4LB OxXOSBGkRau+IFxIXpUhYDNLpWO91gPgAWuYb5mguDmu6B2pC3jH+uv46MS17u0XPQ6W hP5UNpMYUhFxyTw9BOCIDwVo9eZqiKq4to0fzOJhDUmnJ4R/F67I4kPjQTa/wgI7UF3g MIXXwgxPQieqE0o8qTNKHS2i2gPa6p4Dk/6wGGnwwYtGYKvK3sIjqt9+A7d8Fd4mPlNb mZ4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=Hmor8Myo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p28si987964jal.45.2021.03.04.17.03.04; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=Hmor8Myo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233330AbhCDXub (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:50:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232543AbhCDXub (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:50:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7DCC061574 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d11so337949plo.8 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:50:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fBM3x2Jvh9yrxQ8ou6SaTNUrWPPxI8MhXrn4+8d/y8c=; b=Hmor8MyonFhRh2pbmVfovEH002W6qy4lse5CAJQ+/Zm17vWvpD3lWwFdzOICcX+QIu 3DYCK7YULgmVXv0tlY2ijCUyzXAMvvKpjroy9rkuXavrpG98/mg7Vx24VTJf4VNpvZmb NfdaAdu7K432oYrEjhmMEANSWaJU2yeh3J/TI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fBM3x2Jvh9yrxQ8ou6SaTNUrWPPxI8MhXrn4+8d/y8c=; b=QoRS4CN04DSlXR/P3Um8z4R9mJNaH6z1+PdWbVJlQjrHgBgFe+eQqTJPCuBh0TjCgw AfVD8fKgtTTXXMWD0zvbqCCawlhPfWEBLERqnW5Lpwsfuyf27x/Oz7r4d8D+m4vb9m4R /EVFkm37IJxiUsDmrp1Eg0ArkOmfsAFSW5z75tfcDUzl2pbd9EJvRgpIJuaLol96xL4R Bz+znOBkLWb6ih/I8SZuduTUsfiKyMEE8cCP9SRAQCBSWoHbI97EzENx8EItXU4Wkvpb cuEXoI5pTk8YHO7QhkMgTcn8judkegD3IcjzvHIKSDqZRwzE/xkvX7VGh4NmMug9GgNs +Zqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53323vSKUlB0tT3tTR/DahpDycf3TRD4ks6b9ghjY9OfyOjqC2tx y0QwWX4tm24wtdDjqGBftsP34A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:16d6:: with SMTP id y22mr7360453pje.55.1614901830516; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k128sm426613pfd.137.2021.03.04.15.50.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:50:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:50:29 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: zhaojiele Cc: jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] security/loadpin: Replace "kernel_read_file_str[j]" with function "kernel_read_file_id_str(j)". Message-ID: <202103041547.2D77671E92@keescook> References: <20210304083638.174767-1-unclexiaole@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210304083638.174767-1-unclexiaole@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:36:38AM +0000, zhaojiele wrote: > Actually Linux kernel already provide function "kernel_read_file_id_str()" > for secure access in "kernel_read_file.h".And, in "parse_exclude()" > function, there is no need for > "BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str) < > ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id))" > when access array by functon "kernel_read_file_id_str(j)". > > Signed-off-by: zhaojiele > --- > security/loadpin/loadpin.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c > index b12f7d986b1e..3e8bdcd06600 100644 > --- a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c > +++ b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c > @@ -210,8 +210,6 @@ static void __init parse_exclude(void) > */ > BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(exclude_read_files) != > ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id)); > - BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str) < > - ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id)); This should stay to make sure kernel_read_file_str doesn't diverge from the other two. However, maybe it should be tightened to: BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(kernel_read_file_str) - 1 == ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id)); > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exclude_read_files); i++) { > cur = exclude_read_files[i]; > @@ -221,9 +219,9 @@ static void __init parse_exclude(void) > continue; > > for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ignore_read_file_id); j++) { > - if (strcmp(cur, kernel_read_file_str[j]) == 0) { > + if (strcmp(cur, kernel_read_file_id_str(j)) == 0) { > pr_info("excluding: %s\n", > - kernel_read_file_str[j]); > + kernel_read_file_id_str(j)); > ignore_read_file_id[j] = 1; > /* > * Can not break, because one read_file_str I feel funny about making these into function calls when we've already validated the index, but yeah, that would be fine. Can you send a v2 with the earlier suggestion addressed? Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook