Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1645047pxb; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:22:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQxiesSUOqNQI5P2t9/4EYIXhnJ0K7WX7V29n1NrPg/kbBU0vNdzgpfWjxyZctn18Bl6sn X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9418:: with SMTP id v24mr5941840ion.61.1614907358064; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:22:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614907358; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MLLcf7duwiJboFObaDHarwmLxzmfzjX639hraZhUnqqlAQdGyVMVT5swGZ09ZM8BVW sKoRHRQclYSL6haJSzGc0fEM7fUVlsow4s16VQkdU/HivpF00aSbCWfAwooGLxxao2nh YSH9Rw+zxYgHIr2NdZbqMXMRZA5HmfBNvsV83mJtwD8ZOZFpPHeSPiVvoO/gqvv5tjTG S60X67NcKDk+nlbQm0Th2U64yyM4fx3y37su/lKdKZQau2b6qfWJ1nxYTwUWa0QadaLg +/h31YUCAPNlqN09Lj+MuU/BzvVjossTSuDzoWNkjZxvws2h4F3yR4PL7VpLUaOG0uX3 puaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=6JSyVN0P7x6GG2/QIJrnu/2McknYx5xybMCXprXNRik=; b=ZZ+OgLGqoFkhbKAKoOJ5I5PMetqTuASF3YZJaT7dPcAf/uXPMCqPpv7QfxmDXH5Vd7 2V4XGBUWvwIaWCj7RLqB9BPvpqfRQREEuNaWPdSzJgqynODPjg6tv717oOKs8r0mLj1T I4yaQKrFk6wgf9+3XogG87+Q9Dd7HuEU2f3lprkDAfDnjdkwGJqnun833fDgLoKr0p4P ZrzKvaeJK0Utk6tSuOdbhjPzQyhtL4iL+4DIxVDJBWQ8P9yx1IsXsi9k8hdoy5Nv90Si GaJ0yml+oA1rPVZwvSOtAu4BU+J01Rg4W20SU7oi83fjHCG1zhw9JJVHBDpRkW4vI23C ybkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=gV3fjtZ7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z15si795384ilz.66.2021.03.04.17.22.24; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=gV3fjtZ7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229538AbhCEBVV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:21:21 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47914 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229458AbhCEBVV (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:21:21 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8AD864FF0; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 01:21:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1614907280; bh=m4h7ZHJClpaGq4z31HFjlAN1BbQ52JQhKvIB5gkF1OA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gV3fjtZ7OYER8xZbyYzMav33XcDtppeuPKzWbAum91qZLWbgue6N2j0lWoP5Lesq9 8r/lH+nkZkrrs7CqPKd6AvwppXlrL8851hkFWnrCCSWLoYmK1o9gzrdr6pGyuy+AXU J91a9bJZe8LWGJnCKATUTVWlpZDTQYuRy5UIJFig= Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:21:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Andy Shevchenko , "rafael@kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko , Lukasz Luba , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] units: Add the HZ_PER_KHZ macro Message-Id: <20210304172120.437d25238b880f5885e59142@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <3ffdd3de-c30e-f237-7bd7-2700d426e53a@linaro.org> References: <20210223203004.7219-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20210303163125.dcc0a086a939a58ed30750e8@linux-foundation.org> <3ffdd3de-c30e-f237-7bd7-2700d426e53a@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:41:27 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Also, why make them signed types? Negative Hz is physically > > nonsensical. If that upsets some code somewhere because it was dealing > > with signed types then, well, that code needed fixing anyway. > > > > Ditto MILLIWATT_PER_WATT and friends, sigh. > > At the first glance converting to unsigned long should not hurt the > users of this macro. > > The current series introduces the macro and its usage but by converting > the existing type. > > Is it ok if I send a separate series to change the units from L to UL? That's the way to do it...